SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (103007)6/26/2003 2:48:11 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
'the territory is indisputably the historic homeland of the Jews'

Not so, according to available historical record, apparently the canaanites have a prior claim ... unless there's a rule that says because you conquer it once you get to do so again, free pass .... one wonders if perhaps, third time's the charm ..... or is it, three strikes and you're out

As for claiming legitimacy from a UN vote while ignoring votes of censure from the same body in re your fenced-up indigenous, well some typing could be done on that, by those with the time and inclination



To: Neocon who wrote (103007)6/26/2003 3:15:15 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
What is bogus is the argument that the Jews were forced off involuntarily and therefore have a superior right to any other peoples to the land.

The land is indisputably the historic homeland of many, many peoples, including Persians, Egyptians, Canaanites, Turks, Greeks, Romans, etc. etc. etc. None of whom have dibs.

Prior to the UN stepping in and dividing it, the majority of inhabitants were Muslim Arabs, with a substantial minority of Jews and Christian Arabs. It would have been vastly preferable, from a moral standpoint, and a legal standpoint, that land should have been acquired only through purchase.

That is the only legitimate way to acquire land.

The only legitimate way to achieve power is through democracy.

Sometimes the state has to temporarily take power, as the Allies did, temporarily, in Germany and Japan, but it is widely accepted that the Allies had no right to take over the land of Germany and Japan, merely because of conquest.