Re: 8/12-17/03 - CountofMoneyCristo allegedly threatens, via private messages, to add SI users and admin to lawsuit
To:CountofMoneyCristo who started this subject
From: CountofMoneyCristo Tuesday, Aug 12, 2003 1:37 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to 2891 of 2936
I wonder if I am "spinning out of control"? Maybe. Maybe I am off the deep end completely. Yes, winning both motions Aug. 1 was out of control. Schwab backing down completely admitting a mistake, Terra Nova counsel nervously asking the judge if the denial was with prejudice, the writs with the COA requesting an opposition, the appeals I filed, leading to Berber requesting an extra month to think it over and then file his reply, Rea's lawyers parting ways with their client - yes, all wildly out of control.
Rip Van Winkle still asleep while his raft is headed for Angel Falls...
Yes, maybe some here would care to comment why it is that the IRS, to whom I "officially" owe some $50 million in taxes has at no time attempted to seize my assets, but the Virginia Department of Taxation, for a relatively piddling mere $1.4 mill now is trying it all up and down Wall Street? Hmmm, maybe no one on Terra Nova's payroll at IRS...
Message 19202279
=====
To:CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (2891)
From: SI Admin (Bob) Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003 1:51 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to 2907 of 2936
I thought the commentary was going to be very limited or nonexistent. Do I need to pull up the message I quoted you in?
The PM exchanges threatening users with being added as defendants must stop. Add them if you like. Do not threaten them with it or your account's getting yanked again.
You've gone way outside of compliance with the spirit of our agreement and are starting to tread past the letter of it as well.
Message 19205956
=====
To:SI Admin (Bob) who wrote (2907)
From: CountofMoneyCristo Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003 2:02 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to 2908 of 2936
You're right. I will not notify anyone of legal action. If things are said here that merit it - including defamatory and libelous statements concerning tax evasion - better to just go ahead and take those steps without warning.
If you review the thread then you'll see that I've been very restrained. I think many here at SI would agree.
However, if you wish me to limit the discussion further due to member complaints such as some made here by those who clearly are annoyed by the very existence of this thread, people who apparently wish to take advantage of our agreement by launching a one-sided discussion, then please let me know.
I believe I've by and large kept to both the spirit and the letter of our agreement.
Message 19205999
=====
To:CountofMoneyCristo who started this subject
From: CountofMoneyCristo Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003 10:05 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to 2923 of 2936
The federal complaint is almost complete. I'll be filing it in the near future.
I believe that, in the interest of these claims it would be better, until the federal complaint is filed, a copy of which, as I promised, will be posted here immediately after its filing, I should refrain from any further public statements.
I hope those who are following these developments will understand.
And, gives you a chance to more completely enjoy the summer before the Fall begins. So, you all go enjoy and leave this behind for a while. There will be more than enough to discuss in a short while, I promise you.
Olivier
Message 19207784
=====
To:SI Admin (Bob) who wrote (2907)
From: CountofMoneyCristo Saturday, Aug 16, 2003 10:46 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 2936
By the way, the "agreement" you coerced is hereby CANCELED.
I'll say anything I like here, without your interference.
You played ball with the defendants, you kicked me off years ago, many times. You're a part of what happened, you enabled these criminals, you helped them every step of the way.
You do it again now, and I will identify you as one of the 100 DOE Defendants. If that's what you want, then please send me your address, so that I might properly serve you.
I offered you an opportunity to do the right thing, You lied and said you knew nothing. YOU, my friend, know EVERYTHING.
Let's see if you dare say the same thing when a judge warns you that if you lie in front of him you'll be going to federal prison for 5 years minimum.
Message 19216925
=====
To:CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (2933)
From: SI Admin (Bob) Sunday, Aug 17, 2003 12:17 AM
Respond to 2935 of 2936
By the way, the "agreement" you coerced is hereby CANCELED.
So are your posting privileges, asshole. That was really bright of you.
Oh, and I didn't coerce anything out of you. I was planning to leave your account terminated and you voluntarily offered "conditions" you'd comply with in return for the return of your posting privileges. I accepted and returned your posting privileges.
Hmmm... I used the word "privileges" 3 times there. Meaningful?
I'll say anything I like here, without your interference.
Really? You bought the site from me when??? I haven't seen the check.
I never thought you stupid. Until today.
You do it again now, and I will identify you as one of the 100 DOE Defendants. If that's what you want, then please send me your address, so that I might properly serve you.
Oh, gimme a break. You mean you can't get the address on your own? It's really easy. And I'm not a DOE. My name is Bob Zumbrunnen.
I offered you an opportunity to do the right thing,
What's this vague "right thing" you keep referring to? I've asked you this before. You've never answered.
You lied and said you knew nothing.
I'd never say I know nothing. I know many things. I don't know what the hell you're talking about, but there are lots of other things I do know. I'm 44 years old. Knowledge tends to happen after enough years.
YOU, my friend, know EVERYTHING.
I'm most definitely not your friend, and though I thank you for the kind words, I'm definitely not omniscient.
Let's see if you dare say the same thing when a judge warns you that if you lie in front of him you'll be going to federal prison for 5 years minimum.
Yeah, I'm sure they love it when people capriciously and paranoidly name anything and everyone in sight, too.
Everyone, if this character ever bullshits his way into my letting him onto the site again, feel free to perpetually speed-slap me. Letting him back on was a huge mistake. And, sadly, I think his presence has consistently done him more harm than anyone else.
He was let back on in accordance with an agreement he volunteered and that I accepted. An agreement binding only on him. He has "canceled" it. He's gone.
Message 19217048 |
