Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (23276)	7/25/2003 2:42:07 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Ah, the power of the media to deceive & distort. Iraq & 9/11 Iraq & Al Qaeda Don't confuse the huge difference between these two different issues. That's what your article cleverly did. Your article does not make any case that the Bush Administration attempted to link Iraq to 9/11. That's a fact. Your article tries to use the investigation into 9/11, to falsely claim there was no Iraq/Al Qaeda link. The 9/11 investigation never looked into the link between Iraq & Al Qaeda. Your article is being cunningly deceptive because of politicians & liberal media outlets repeated lies that Bush claimed a link between Iraq & 9/11. They used that false allegation, then they state there was no link between Iraq & Al Qaeda. This investigation was never about an Iraq/Al Qaeda link. The Bush Administration made links between Iraq & Al Qaeda. They made absolutely no claims that Iraq was involved in 9/11. You can't seem to separate the obvious differences here. And your article is relying on your confusion so they can deceptively claim that the 9/11 report doesn't mention any Iraq/Al Qaeda link when that investigation had nothing to do with this link. It was about 9/11 so there is absolutely no reason for it to mention a link between Iraq & Al Qaeda. You need to read your article objectively. The article I linked you to makes absolutely no reference to a Bush Administration official linking Iraq to 9/11. If anything the article discusses, "U.S. officials, however, said they had no evidence that Atta ever went to Prague, and had indications that he might have been in the United States when the meeting supposedly took place.". The only reference to Iraq & 9/11 is CNN's own reference to the theory that there was a link, but the article does not link the theory to any Bush Administration officials. Both articles support my POV. You need to read objectively. Even then you can't be sure your favorite politicians or your favorite media outlets aren't lying or repeating lies as I just clearly showed..... Message 19144949 Message 19145047