SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (112773)8/25/2003 8:33:08 PM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Sounds like Clark's ideas for what to do in the future are not too dissimilar from what the present administration intends to do.

General Clark is willing to share decision making and power with Nato and the UN. Responsibility for 95% of the troops, 95% of the bills and 100% of decisions is a bad strategy. He offers proven leadership qualities and a record of getting things done with diversity.

And he can speak EXTEMPORANEOUSLY about ideas. Have press conferences. Take questions.

Rascal @tipped.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (112773)8/26/2003 8:46:13 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Re Clark's position on Iraq: <If we are successful, the cost of this mission will be measured in years, tens of billions of dollars and dozens more soldiers' lives lost. But failure will be more expensive, and a premature pull-out will exacerbate regional conflict and undercut the War on Terror.>

<"Think the antiwar folks will notice this?">

Is Clark a unilateralist? Or is he willing to cede authority to the UN?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News