Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bux who wrote (4779)	9/5/2003 1:47:33 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Dear Bux, Once again I must be blunt and do that task where first one states "I'am NOT speaking for BobZ, nor am I placing words and thoughts of Sheriff Matt of his past, present and future." - I'am always amazing how easy it is to declare the above, as a type of disclaimer, as if I now have the right to continue and relate to you how your words have been received by another, having such & such impact with consequence. - In truth its folly for anyone to give me the go-ahead. - But truth really is, folks like me that communicate like this, and don't ask permission to speak for others, but do, usually see a level of hiding and falsehood accompanied by atleast one person like a Babe in Woods totally out of the ability range to Wheel & Deal in a fashion... - - stop - to much me babbling - restart - Once again, Dear Bux, - My assumption that you have decided that BobZ will accept "at face value" what you say as being what you really believe as being true & honest, and not punch holes into it as simple tactics used by one who knows that the only way to accomplish and reach a certain point, which for you is to regain your iHub membership WITH the ability to continue and expand the methods you have used on the IDCC board, that which brang you here..... (oops, need a new sentence here) You think, probably correctly, that BobZ cannot expose these dishonest ways of yours since to do so would in effect place BobZ inbetween you and Sheriff Matt, making it seem that Matt's ability to fully exercise his job description on Ihub is lacking in strength and depth to get the job done when the job goes into difficult areas, like you for example. - surprise surprise While Sheriff Matt knows the above is happening, Matt is not yet of age and experience to handle you except to shove you into the Jailhouse and control you using the quite unfair motions that "you are guilty and must speak your crimes and ask for forgiveness and then be allowed to return with your understanding that you will not make the same crime again." - In your case thats the only level Matt can obtain, and Matt has so far refused to acknowledge that while his methods work 99.5% of the time, your case is the 0.05% that he is unable to deal with to make a correct opinion of what was done wrong, and measures needed for a correction. - Evidence (your words to BobZ) ... we are in substantial agreement ... wish I could say the same with regard to Matt. ... [who cut off communication.] To be clear [was] Matt. ... In hindsight [done differently] was to admit to the kangaroo charge... ... not willing to lie ... to discuss [like] mature adults [not] possible with Matt. Now that Matt has admitted [beyond] reasonable doubt ... I may be too trusting and foolish for having purchased a lifetime membership from such an outfit but I'm not a complete idiot. Once