Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (259813)	9/10/2003 5:28:06 PM
From: NOW	Respond to of 436258

ROFL!

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (259813)	9/10/2003 5:28:26 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

seriously, the whole idea of insurance -- where you get something that costs more than you pay is flawed -- giving it over to some flippin' buryacart like Hillary will only make it worse, not better. Why shouldn't you pay the full price for your visit to the doctor?? I got no problem with public funds for immunization but we can't protect everybody from themselves.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (259813)	9/10/2003 5:34:14 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Ok Mike, time for me to step in-g, I still make house calls for some of my less able patients and alas, I'm alone in this area that still does...the re-imbursement game insurers play is no joke and the fee's are outrageous for insured, it's the biggest, bestest scam going if you ask me... they literally get away with robbery of the patient especially the supplemental insurers...dont get me started. drug cos raise cost of meds and insurers dump them in your lap even though they take in more than enough to pay the tab, and they say..ie BLueCrxx that they are Not for profit ROFL