Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (4927)	9/21/2003 8:01:33 AM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Doug that was a rather long respond to a very short note that said: 1) rruufff observation that some of your messages were incomprehensible should not be taken as an insult. Considering the state of my English I am sure I am getting more criticism than you...... 2) your sarcastic "See, I'm not posting to you, but about you as an Alert to others." was not called for and as such was pretty low. You managed to write a lengthy response without really responding to any of the above 2 points. I am sure you have a good point somewhere but it must be very well hidden BTW remember, it's all in timing <ggggggg>

To: d:oug who wrote (4927)	9/21/2003 9:49:36 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 5315

Hi Doug, I think you will like my post. You have some good thoughts and probably good intentions. As many of us age, we often lose our sense of "trying to save the world." I commend you for continuing your mission. I often feel I am doing similar work, but then reality strikes. I hope reality doesn't strike you similarly. I think you have the wrong target and the wrong mission. Self-absorbed individuals (and that's not necessarily a bad trait) need to understand, there is a need to take on the highest challenge and take the higest road. Only then will reaching the summit, or failing, mean the road was worth the trod. You might want to look in the mirror and evaluate your next post before you "send." All things considered, I don't think our "dialog" is any longer "on topic." Your meanderings that relate to SI or as you term "the sherriffs" is truly rambling and not relevant to the issues presented here and certainly not to the issue I originally raised. I suppose it is your right to continue to obfuscate. However, IMO, you are not adding anything to either making this a better place or creating a clarity, which was my original stated goal. Take care, RRUFFF