Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (75295)	9/22/2003 3:08:26 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Message 19331016 If you have not identified people as high risk, then on what basis do you discriminate against homosexuals and women? That they are weak? What? What have you been cartooning about to justify the exclusion of homosexuals and women from being treated by a male therapist? If the risk is not due to their nature as an identifiable group, then why does the risk not obtain equally with heterosexuals and lesbians? And if the risk is equal, then why do I have scores of posts on record where you specifically point your finger at these two groups as being at risk for misconduct? And now you say you have not identified them as high risk. Well, I guess you have come over to my side, then? If they are not to be discriminated against on the basis of risk, then presumably you have no other reasons you would like to atttach to justify your discrimination against them? Good! Very good!! I will go shopping for a couple of hours, and enjoy contemplating your new and improved position!