SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (469861)10/2/2003 9:50:35 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Who took the bigger chance? Clinton with bombing or Bush with his invasion? The answer is easy. Bush took the bigger chance. He bet his Presidency on Iraq. Right now, it looks like a bad bet because public opinion has turned negative on the Iraq war.



To: DavesM who wrote (469861)10/2/2003 10:44:31 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
he didn't invade pre-emptively....

That's the difference between throwing a rock at a tarbaby, and giving it a bear-hug.

TP



To: DavesM who wrote (469861)10/2/2003 10:45:39 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Saddam got caught red handed with chemical weapons in 1998 by UN inspectors and Clinton was too busy boinking fat girls in the Oval office to declare the cease fire over. Saddam kicked the inspectors out immediately after he got busted.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News