SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (12571)10/16/2003 8:16:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 793917
 
First, most of the money is wasted. It costs many times more to do things the US army/Halliburton way than if Iraqis were doing the work by themselves. So far, Iraqi reconstruction is mostly a vast pork barrel project for connected non-Iraqi (mostly US) companies.

Second, there is no sovereign Iraqi government that can legitimately sign up for these loans. Iraq is under US control, and I am sure no Iraqi in his right mind will want to pay US Army prices for the reconstruction that is going on over there.


Agreed. I would add, Third, we care about our foreign image and it looks extremely bad when the richest country in the world demands loans from a poor and broken country that it has just conquered, even if the poor country has oil and is only poor because of misrule.



To: KyrosL who wrote (12571)10/16/2003 8:17:00 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
First, most of the money is wasted. It costs many times more to do things the US army/Halliburton way than if Iraqis were doing the work by themselves

KyrosL.....could you provide some specific examples of this statement, and perhaps some links that would prove that comment???


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News