Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (13887)	10/26/2003 7:58:55 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793690

If he were wiccan, no one here would be attacking him because no left wing crusading journalist would have "exposed" him.

To: Lane3 who wrote (13887)	10/26/2003 1:34:31 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793690

If the person were Wiccan and the media plastered his/her speech from a Wiccan full moon gathering all over the front pages, you bet I would be just as surprised to see so many Americans willing to condemn the person. Expecially, since the events in question have already been known to be manipulated by the original writer and church recorder of the story. There's still a question you haven't answered. Why do you think William Arkin added in the false quotes "jihad" (which he has admitted to), and "he takes his orders not from his Army superiors but from God" (which he has yet to produced the transcripts to support). Do you believe these were honest mistakes made by a confused writer? Or is it more likely the former Greenpeace, Human Rights Watch worker who recently declared in a speech that our foreign policy "convey[s] the wrong message, which is that we have no values, that we are for sale", was actually out to bring down our military during a time of war and engender support for his foreign policy view?