SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (78547)11/2/2003 11:53:12 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
No excuses: Part II
By Walter Williams
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published November 2, 2003

Last week's column discussed parts of Abigail and Stephen Thernstrom's new book, "No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning." It's a gap that finds the average black high-school graduate having achieved only what the average white youngster has achieved by the seventh or eighth grade.

Popular recognition of the education meltdown has led to calls for student testing as a condition for high-school graduation. The public education establishment resists such tests. Theodore Sizer, former Harvard Graduate School of Education dean, in his opposition said, "The myriad, detailed and mandatory state curriculum frameworks, of whatever scholarly brilliance, are attacks on intellectual freedom," adding, "High stakes tests arising from these curricula compound the felony."

Deborah Meier, founder of New York's Central Park East schools, condemned standardized tests as failing to "measure the only important qualities of a well-educated person.... Life scores [not math scores] based on living" should be the educator's concern.

Peter Sacks, another educationist, argues that testing is "abusive," "inaccurate," "meaningless" and "a highly effective means of social control." Mr. Sacks concludes that tests amount "to the academic lynching of children of color." Opposition to tests, as a condition for graduation, has supporters among most members of the faculty at the leading graduate schools of education.

The education establishment also has opposed teacher certification tests and often labeled them as racially discriminatory. Perhaps it's because of the large failure rate among prospective teachers, particularly minority teachers. In 1998, of 1,800 Massachusetts teachers taking the test, 60 percent failed.

According to Education World, "Seven states use the National Evaluation System's tests, 27 use the National Teachers Exam, 43 ask new teachers to pass basic skills tests, and 32 require teachers to demonstrate proficiency in the subjects they teach. Teachers have not done well on those tests. Failure rates are between 20 and 30 percent on the basic skills and proficiency tests and 50 to 55 percent on the National Teachers Exam."

Keep in mind that to pass the teacher certification test you need only eighth-, ninth- and, at best, 10th-grade skills. For example, a multiple choice math question asks: "Amy drinks one-and-a-half cups of milk three times a day. At this rate, how many cups will she drink in one week?"

America's public education rot goes beyond incompetent teachers. According to the Sept. 2 New York Post, in the school year 2002-03, "1,495 Department of Education employees and other school workers were arrested — 228 more than the previous year — an 18 percent increase." Those arrested included teachers (371), custodians (243), paraprofessionals (181) and school aides (106). Among the charges were assault (313), drugs (435), robbery (180), weapons (88), sex abuse (36) and falsifying documents (74). How representative New York's school system is of other big city school systems is hard to say.

Where is educational rot the worst? If you said at predominantly black inner-city schools, go to the head of the class. Inner-city schools are home to the least-qualified teachers. For example, in a dozen Chicago schools, 40 percent of the teaching staff flunked one or more tests. One teacher flunked 24 out of 25 tries, including all 12 of the tests in the subject she taught. Nevertheless, she is still teaching. None of this is to say there aren't a few competent and dedicated inner-city teachers battling tremendous odds.

Here's my question: Do parents, particularly black parents, know or even care about what's being done to their children in the name of education? Do they know that the A or B on their children's report card is worthless?

Don't say the solution lies in more money unless you're prepared to show me great results with expenditures of $15,000 per student in Massachusetts and $13,000 in Washington, D.C., and skyrocketing education budgets elsewhere.

Walter Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist.
washtimes.com



To: Rambi who wrote (78547)11/2/2003 7:01:02 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"The route to greater academic excellence is nearly a no-brainer. There are three vital inputs to education: parents, teachers and students. You tell me: How much money does it take for teachers to assign homework, and for parents and teachers to see that it gets done? How much money does it take to see to it that kids get a good night's sleep, come to school on time, don't fight in school, and respect authority? If these no-brainer things aren't accomplished, there's no amount of money that's going to make much difference. "

It takes a lot of money to do these things if the child cannot have these at home. You might need to pay teachers enough to have afternoon studyhalls. I donate my time to have a study hall at lunch for struggling readers- but most teachers cannot find that kind of time in their day, because they work full time. So money might just be necessary, since most people want to be paid for what they do. It takes a lot of money to see that some kids get the sleep they need. Some parents force their kids to work, to pay rent to them. Even in my suburban high school we see this. I had a very bright student who constantly feel asleep in my class last year, and that's because he was working. He doesn't feel he can go to college because he'll never be able to get the money together for college AND for rent to his parents. What can you do with parents like that? And those problems mushroom in the inner city environment- where some kids are protecting their siblings, or even providing the majority of care. Those "no brainer" ideas of his are great- too bad he thinks these things can actually come from all the parents. It's not fair to doom the children of dysfunctional parents to failure- they should be given their shot at a future, even if we need to spend a lot of money to break the cycle of their family life. The cost of not doing it is even greater. There are creative ways we can work around the parents- but it will take money for infrastructure, social services, mentors, mentor teachers (who could help take the place of the missing or dysfunctional parents), and most of all it would take a will to spend more, for those who have the least.



To: Rambi who wrote (78547)11/3/2003 12:23:14 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
X is right. The core problem isn't with the schools, or with the teachers, or even with society.

It's with the parents.

I could tell you stories you wouldn't believe. Just one. My friend, the Sheriff, brought a middle school boy home to his mother (divorced, no father) at about midnight one night. The boy had been drinking and had tried with three other boys to steal a car for joyriding.

The mother's response? "You deal with it. I don't have time now -- I'm watching Jay Leno."

Untypical? Extreme?

I wish.