Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (521857)	1/9/2004 7:15:24 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

How many did we have the 200 years before? The point is that al Qaeda declared war on our innocent women and children, yet hasn't been able to mount an attack on us since 9-11 because of the superb job this administration is doing wrt national defense.

To: SilentZ who wrote (521857)	1/9/2004 7:45:37 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"How many did we have in the two years before?" Tiger was stating that we are no safer after the attack. I was trying to get at his reasoning behind that. Do you think the line above justifies Tiger's statement? I don't. But the lefties (I am assuming you are one) have a strange sense (or lack) of logic. My reasoning in believing we are a bit safer is that we attacked them and hurt them badly and have been disrupting their capabilities to plan and raise money. I would think they would like to make an attack on us if they could. God forbid they have another success, but if the dems and the lefties and the America haters don't push America off course the problem can be brought under control in the next 5 to 10 years. But to Tiger, it is all America's fault anyway I am sure. So I am not even really sure who he is rooting for in the war on terrorism. What side are you on?