Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (559585)	4/3/2004 10:50:03 PM
From: Ryan Plovie (Hijacked)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If the situation would ever arise that I impregnated someone in which there was no possibility of marriage, I suppose that I would seriously consider an abortion. But all the while I would consider it knowing fully well that I'd be killing a little baby. What about you? Do you think it's a little baby?

To: E who wrote (559585)	4/4/2004 10:13:35 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

E, hiding behind an anonymous handle lying again. The government should not use money I paid in taxes to assist in the murder of innocent children. You are free to fund those who will to tear a child apart ripping it arms and legs off until it is dead. And a child conceived because of a rape has the same rights as any child. Do believe that that child has fewer rights? Are children born from a conception in rape somehow dirty or inferior to others. That is clearly the logical implication of your arguments. Your attitude is saturated with ignorance, stupidity and barbarism. You reach for terms. The zygote or an embryo is a human life on a path to maturity. That fetus is a human life on the path to maturity. All human life has the same rights. At different stages of human life the dependence on others to continue living changes. And at any stage that life continues or dies because of natural causes or some other human supports it or kills it. E is for the right of other humans to kill with intent an innocent life. Even by ripping it apart live. Vile disgusting sadistic.

To: E who wrote (559585)	4/5/2004 9:40:11 AM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

yes, it is the law, a major point in this debate I am pro-choice simply because it is not my right to make decisions about the personal lives of others - it has nothing to do with my personal opinions on abortion, yet people tend to confuse the two issues the majority of the time - you don't have to think abortion is right to be pro-choice - you're not agreeing with the way a person decides to lead their lives, you don't have to support their choices - we should all recognize an individual's right to live their own life, make their own decisions, take responsibility and have accountability for those choices anyone who disagrees with me has that right too and I wish them no ill - they are entitled to that view and it would be wrong of anyone to deny them such - I however will keep advocating pro-choice, for everyone