SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (9873)5/1/2004 8:27:59 AM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
You're right on that Brumar (on Bush).

Getting out of Iraq is one issue - one of about 20 that are very important.

If I agree with Kerry on say 18 of 20 issues, and disagree with Bush on 20 of 20 issues - well you can see, there is no choice for me - I will vote for Kerry.

The next President will be either Bush or Kerry, so it's an easy choice for me.

I disagreed with Clinton on NAFTA at first also, and on how he did welfare reform - but he was still one of our greatest Presidents. He did more for the average person in this country in 8 years than anyone since FDR, IMHO.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (9873)5/1/2004 10:18:51 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
"Another is that "OUT OF IRAQ NOW" people think Kerry isn't sincere about staying and finishing the job. He's just saying what he thinks he needs to to fool people who aren't "US OUT OF IRAQ NOW!" people into voting for him. This is another possibility. I can see that "OUT OF IRAQ NOW" people would vote for a "finish the job" person if they think the "finish the job" position is just a pose.

And personally I've now seen and heard enough about Kerry to think it is a pose."

I think it is a pose, myself. I doubt Kerry would get us out of iraq as quickly as I would like, but I do think he will get us out. Also I doubt he will engage us in similar debacles.

So he's the lesser of two evils.