SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Id who wrote (131637)5/5/2004 6:02:31 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Everybody reported it as an expression of regret and dismay, which is an apology.



To: Dr. Id who wrote (131637)5/5/2004 6:06:12 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
<<And if you watched it and saw no apology, why did you repeatedly state that there was one?>>

From what I saw he was saying what happened was wrong. Condemned the actions. That was good enough for me. May be you need him to drop to his knees so hard he breaks them and scream Allah, please forgive me for what those nasty people did.



To: Dr. Id who wrote (131637)5/5/2004 6:13:27 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I think an apology would be against OUR principles. It would be unconscionable for the CIC to prematurely (before court martial) declare the truth of the matter, when in fact it has not been established. Police Chiefs are often under the same duress when officers are accused of wrong-doing. Video or no it is not the kosher thing to do and every lawyer on this site would tell you the same.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News