SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unclewest who wrote (45130)5/18/2004 7:19:10 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793817
 
Sarin I understood the injection for sarin is to avoid panic in the battlefield. actually if you think you need it ,,, it is too late.



To: unclewest who wrote (45130)5/18/2004 10:09:31 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 793817
 
I am learning some new lessons about war.
Everything about war is easy from the back seat.


Brilliant.



To: unclewest who wrote (45130)5/18/2004 11:26:22 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793817
 
If the shell in question had not been old and rusty, and had worked as it was designed to work, the people in the vicinity would be dead.

Sick is better than dead. Especially that particular kind of dead, like spraying a roach to the nth degree.

It's absurd to act as if you know more about chemical warfare than I do. We both know what we know by reading about it in publications equally available. I read stuff published by the CDC and various scientific research groups.

I may know more, my husband is a chemical engineer who studied chemical warfare agents while working on his masters degree in public health. He knows more than me, and I pass on what we talk about.

Also, unless you studied chemistry in college, both organic and inorganic, I know more chemistry than you.

I think you're just pissed off because I am laughing at the excitement over one little rusty old Sarin shell, saying that it doesn't justify the war.