SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (14883)12/29/2004 4:10:41 AM
From: WWWWWWWWWW  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
Umm..

Various agencies in the US have tried to convince those governments to put in tsunami warning systems over the years. They didn't, despite what we said.

The death and destruction is not our fault. I repeat, it's not our fault.

I must say it astounds me that some people use this natural disaster as a way to concoct criticisms of the US. I guess when you're #1, it goes with the territory.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14883)12/29/2004 5:04:31 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 20773
 
A Delta Project for the Indian Ocean Rim?

1953 - Flood disaster

The Dutch struggle against the waters.


In February 1953 the Netherlands faced disaster when the dikes protecting the southwest of the country were breached by the joint onslaught of a hurricane-force northwesterly wind and exceptionally high spring tides. The flood came in the night without warning, a fateful combination of freak high tides and gale-force winds that killed 1,835 people. Almost 200,000 hectares of land was swamped, 3,000 homes and 300 farms destroyed, and 47,000 heads of cattle drowned. It was The Netherlands' worst disaster for 300 years.

Flooding caused by storm surges were nothing new to the Netherlands, but this time the nation was stunned by the extent of a disaster unparalleled for centuries.

Emergency aid flowed in from all over the world to help soften the blow to a country only just recovering from war. Ironically enough, the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management had published a policy document only a few days previously detailing plans to prevent precisely this sort of disaster. The document proposed that all the tidal inlets and estuaries in the provinces of Zeeland and South Holland should be dammed. In the light of the disaster, urgent action was taken to implement this plan, known as the 'Delta Project'.

The earliest inhabitants of the Netherlands protected themselves against flooding by constructing mounds ('terps') on which to build their farmsteads and houses. Later occupants of these mounds started to protect larger areas of land by building dikes between them.

Around 1300, large parts of the present-day Netherlands still lay under water. In the centuries that followed, more and more land was wrested from the sea by constructing dikes and using windmills to pump away the water. It was the advent of the windmill in around 1300 and its use in land drainage that formed the landscape of the Netherlands as we know it today. By 1800 there were some 9000 windmills in the Netherlands. The 16th and 17th centuries saw a boom in wind-powered lake reclamation schemes financed by wealthy Amsterdam merchant-entrepreneurs. These created large polder areas unlike anything else in the world. The hydraulic expert Jan Adriaenszoon Leeghwater (1575-1650) is famous in connection with the reclamation and drainage of North Holland. He even wrote a book (the Haarlemmermeerboeck) explaining how the vast 7,000-hectare Haarlemmermeer between Amsterdam and Leiden could be reclaimed, a feat not in fact accomplished until two centuries later (1848-1852), after the arrival of the steam-driven pumping station.

Throughout history, the populations of the Dutch coastal provinces have been regularly afflicted by devastating storm surges. The most famous are the St. Elisabeth Flood of 1421 and the All Saints' Day flood of 1570, which cost the lives of many thousands of people and caused enormous damage. The area around the Zuyder Zee suffered badly in 1916. The danger of flooding could come either from the Zuyder Zee or from the Rhine/Maas delta in the southwest. As early as 1667, Hendric Stevin, son of the more famous Simon Stevin, produced a plan to prevent flooding around the Zuyder Zee by damming the channels between the islands in the Wadden Sea. At that time the technology simply did not exist to do this but the idea persisted and in 1889 a thorough study was made of its technical feasibility. One of those responsible was Cornelis Lely (1854-1929), later Minister of Water Management. It was he who - prompted by the disastrous floods of 1916 - was finally to commission the necessary works to seal off the Zuyder Zee from the North Sea by constructing a Barrier Dam from the tip of North Holland to the Frisian mainland. Work began on the 32-km-long dam in 1927 and the last opening in it was sealed on 28 May 1932. Later, large parts of the Zuyder Zee - rechristened the IJsselmeer - were drained to create two huge new polders: the Noordoostpolder and Flevoland.

The Delta Project was one of the greatest post-war feats of hydraulic engineering in the Netherlands. Immediately after the devastating storm surge of 1953, a Delta Commission was appointed to advise the government on the necessary works to protect the south-western part of the country. The first step was to construct a moveable storm surge barrier in the Hollandse IJssel, east of Rotterdam. This went into operation in 1958. The next move was the closure of the Veerse Gat and the Zandkreek in 1961. This necessitated the building of great sluices to regulate the discharge of water from the major rivers. Huge dams with sluice gates were likewise completed in 1971 to close off the Haringvliet and in 1972 to protect the Brouwershavensche Gat. The Philips and Oester Dams followed in 1974 and 1987 respectively. Plans for the closure of the last open estuary, the Eastern Scheldt, were also on the table, but evoked a clamour of protest from mussel and oyster farmers and environmentalists. They were fiercely opposed to closure on the grounds that it would destroy a unique tidal area and that the Eastern Scheldt was the nursery for many species of North Sea fish. Eventually a compromise was reached. A partially open storm surge barrier would be built, with huge gates that could be closed in the event of high water levels. This would preserve the ecological value of the Eastern Scheldt as a tidal area while at the same time guaranteeing the safety of Zeeland. The resulting storm surge barrier in the Eastern Scheldt is one of the biggest in the world. The components for the moveable gates, each the size of a twelve-storey block of flats, were built in special docks and floated into place before being sunk. The dam was officially opened by Queen Beatrix on 4 October 1986 and the final piece of the Delta Works jigsaw was slotted into place in 1997, when a moveable storm surge barrier was completed in the New Waterway. This consists of two vast gates which are normally kept open but can be closed when a storm is imminent.

In 1993 and 1995 there were two new flood emergencies in the Netherlands. There were no fatalities, but the economic damage was enormous. This time the flooding came not from the sea but from the rivers. In 1995, meltwater from the mountainous heartland of Europe and extremely heavy rainfall downstream combined to burst the banks of the Rhine and the Maas and more than 250,000 people had to be evacuated. This latest flood emergency led immediately to the drafting of a Delta Plan for the Major Rivers. This provides for the major rivers transecting the Netherlands to be given greater freedom to spill out across some parts of their traditional floodplains, while the height of the dikes controlling them is increased elsewhere.

(Source: Ministerie van Buitelandse Zaken)

thehollandring.com



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14883)12/29/2004 5:27:55 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 20773
 
Tsunamis may be unifying event

By Daniel Altman International Herald Tribune

Wednesday, December 29, 2004


As coastal residents in southern and southeastern Asia sort through the remains of their homes and businesses, experts gauging the long-term effects of the tsunamis say they may not all be negative, especially where political and economic factors intersect.

In Sri Lanka, for example, the challenge posed by a natural disaster could conceivably help create common ground between the government and the Tamil rebels who control much of the northern part of the country.

"This has affected a very narrow strip all the way around the coast," said Alessandro Pio, the country director for the Asian Development Bank in Colombo. "It's a disaster that affects both the north and the south, both of the parties in the civil war."

As a result, Pio said, cooperation between the two sides may be logical or even necessary from a logistical standpoint.

The effects of such cooperation could be far-reaching. Five years ago, earthquakes in Greece and Turkey began a political thaw that has arguably culminated in Turkey's candidacy for the European Union.

In Indonesia, the government this week lifted a ban on international aid to Aceh, where separatists have been fighting a guerrilla war for a quarter-century.

"I'm hoping that this will generate a certain feeling of national unity in trying to respond together to this adversity," Pio said of Sri Lanka's tragedy. "That's really one of the pivot factors in terms of the economy taking off on a higher growth path."

In India, despite the fact that the tsunamis were the first for decades, they may become part of an ongoing learning process for dealing with natural catastrophes. In particular, they present an opportunity for the government to show that it is serious about preparing homes, businesses, public buildings and other infrastructure for future disasters.

"In general, the approach to disaster management in India has changed considerably," said G Padmanabhan, an emergency analyst at the United Nations Development Program in Delhi. He said that building laws and regulations had been modified to require disaster-proof construction, but that more officials needed training in enforcement and engineering techniques.

"The government has recently started programs to train people," he said. "I hope in the reconstruction process they will enforce these, so we don't recreate this vulnerability."

An early implementation of the new laws came in the state of Gujarat, which experienced a severe earthquake almost four years ago. "There was a big hospital completely destroyed by the earthquake in 2001," Padmanabhan said. "The new hospital constructed in the same site is fully earthquake resistant."

In addition, Padmanabhan said, the government is creating a system to monitor potential tsunamis. "That would be a useful thing, because we don't know if it could happen again," he said. He added that while lasting effects on the Indian economy might be few, the tsunamis would become part of a learning experience that began with floods and earthquakes in recent years.

The chance that tsunamis will return, perhaps as a result of aftershocks from this week's earthquake, could also affect rebuilding decisions, said Claire Rubin, senior research scientist at the Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management at George Washington University in Washington.

"You would have this dilemma of where to rebuild your ports, or where you keep your fishing fleet," she said. "You have to rebuild next to the water, but you're likely to have it go out again." Some choices could even affect an economy's long-run earning potential. In cases where the destruction has been particularly thorough, "they may decide that place is not going to be rebuilt."

In the United States, Rubin said, rebuilding decisions have depended on a balance of risks. After a tsunami swept through Valdez, Alaska, in 1964, the state supported rebuilding at a higher elevation. Yet after Hurricane Iniki destroyed hotels overlooking beaches in Hawaii in 1992, just 10 years after Hurricane Iwa devastated the area, the owners rebuilt in exactly the same spots. "They put things right back, with their scenic ocean view," Rubin said. "They made a certain calculation."

For local economies that depend entirely on tourism, these are momentous decisions. "The question is, how long will it take for them to rebuild the infrastructure in order to prevent people from moving away from these regions and looking for new employment prospects?" said Simon Quijano-Evans, a senior emerging markets analyst at HVB Group in Vienna.

Given the differences between the countries hit by the tsunamis, the size of these effects is likely to vary. Because of the rarity of tsunamis in Sri Lanka, Pio said, he did not expect problems with tourism beyond this season. "People will remember this, but it's not something that you'd think will be recurring fairly frequently," he said.

Longer-lasting effects could occur in the insurance industry, but Pio warned that it was too early to tell whether the brunt of claims would affect domestic rather than international backers. So far, major global insurers have predicted fairly modest liabilities. Munich Re, the biggest of the reinsurers, on Tuesday forecast claims of less than €100 million, or $136 million.

Governments and outside organizations are just beginning to assess the extent of the damage to their economies. In Thailand, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said repairs could total 20 billion baht, or more than $500 million. Almost as much may be spent by India, according to an estimate from ICRA, a rating agency there. The governments' finances are solid enough to prevent problems in international markets, Quijano-Evans of HVB Group said.

iht.com



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14883)12/29/2004 10:09:14 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
Dale,

I am in complete agreement with you. The reaction of the Bush Administration to the plight of millions in the aftermath of the tsunami is stunning. Stunning in its callous indifference to humanity.

Here's an editorial that sums up why all Americans should be repulsed that we have such an uncaring oaf in the White House today:

Message 20898750

It is time for this failed President to be repudiated by all decent Americans.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14883)12/31/2004 2:31:12 PM
From: Yogizuna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
It stinks to the high heavens... The technology is there, but "they" really do not want to save people. Let us not forget there are some very evil people all around us who actually enjoy human pain and suffering in their own way, and I am not just talking about Bin-Laden & Co...