SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (155456)1/7/2005 8:59:46 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If that is the case, we have nothing to argue about. Bush acted on available intelligence, and also announced liberation of the Iraqi people as one of our goals. You have just conceded that he did not need UN approval, and therefore did not need his cause to be universally approved. Thanks for acknowledging that he acted within his rights, even if the legal argument were set aside........



To: GST who wrote (155456)1/7/2005 9:00:32 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
WMDs in sadaams hands was actionable cause. Everyone except Maurice and Scott Ritter believe saddam had wmds. None of us are really sure if those weapons didnt wind up in syria. And then as NC always points out, his desire to recostitute after sanctions faded away was even a worse threat. Thats reasonable cause if the assumptions are correct. Of course with the rear view mirror no action ever taken cant be criticised. Mike


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News