Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/21/2005 11:04:29 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 5425

Duh. Have you looked for us on other message boards?

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/22/2005 5:27:03 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

re: "Lets do a little review of our crime busters to see what they have been doing since the Mr. Elgindy arrest... Bill Ulrich Member 3735787 Digital Photography and Got A Great Recipe To Share???? Not much crime busting there. Recipes! lol" Well, the mentally un-impaired will understand that my sole focus on SI isn't to uncover every cockroach in every dirtbag scam stock anybody got themselves into. I actually have some real life and "other" interests. I am a man of many many talents. If you find cooking and photography objectionable, I have others, too. Perhaps a detailed viewing of my coat pocket lint collection is more in line with your cognitive ability. Should I have mentioned "abilities", in the plural, it would overstate the case. I really can't imagine why you would find cooking and photography objectionable, but then again ... I've never had to pack myself into such a small comprehension box of what the world is about. That is, I've never had to be small-minded. Thanks for sharing how much of life exists within your cranium.

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/22/2005 1:08:32 PM
From: Pluvia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

ummmm yea... try actually doing some dd... we've published several reports since ap's arrest. many others you note have done PILES of work exposing scams... all of which is availabe on various boards for historic purposes.... if you cared to actually look... consider that and the fact we're not in the bubble market of 98-2000. apples and oranges. eg Subject 54392

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/22/2005 1:51:15 PM
From: hedgefundman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

volume of crime busters', as you call 'em, posting is definitely down. you got one answer from pluvia but his volume is down also. one call on ivan it looks like. (pluvia, you say "we" in your post. who is "we" for purposes of discussion here? or did you mean "weeeeee?") so logically it must be one or more of these reasons 1. less scams available for the "buster" 2. old age, incapacity, retirement of the "busters" 2. unable to, scared to and-or unwilling to, trade before publishing bashing analysis PR's, so no way to make moola on the "bustin'" (do double negatives make a positive? does front runnin' on a front runner negate both scams?) 3. network of sheeple, associates,& hangers-on, freaked and a waitin' for findings of jury 4. some other reason that i'm sure a sheeple will give like "a higher callin'" hehe

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/23/2005 6:19:45 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Here laddie, I made some Irish Lamb Stew fahrrr ye. It's delicious!: Message 20975607

To: Yahoot who wrote (2291)	1/23/2005 10:37:56 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 5425

Lets do a little review of our crime busters to see what they have been doing since the Mr. Elgindy arrest. Nothing gives you the warm and fuzzies when "crime busting" than to get a phone call from an "informant" that this person or that person you are checking out is mob, so be careful. Or, on the other side of the spectrum, to sit for hours on the phone with someone devastated about losing all their money to the owner of a scam company and fearful for their life if said owner ever found out they were "talking." Am I proud of all those companies the SEC shut down I helped nail in some way or other? Yes. But that doesn't mean I'm willing to go to the same lengths again given I (foolishly?) never did it for the money. If you encountered a veteran on the street back from years fighting in Iraq, would you ridicule him about what freedom fighting he has done lately and why he has not re-enlisted? - Jeff