SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (59447)1/26/2005 1:05:08 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Taikun,

I don't think your ideas hang together very well, and I've tried to explain why. I can't base conclusions on simple tabloid discussion by a non-scientific reporter featuring a one-sentence quote by a scientist talking about a different geographical location.

To consider this further I'd have to see a direct, detailed cause and effect statement by a reputable group of scientists specifically supporting the theory that the recent Sumatra quake was caused by global warming.

-Snow



To: Taikun who wrote (59447)1/26/2005 8:45:26 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
David, it's not surprising that Greenland's ice gap melting would cause the land underneath to shift. Of course it would. That's the isostacy I mentioned. It won't cause an earthquake in New Zealand.

Mqurice


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News