Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (230034)	4/19/2005 7:47:03 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573852

And let me point out that the murder was without the consent of the mother........it was an unlawful invasion of her right to privacy and her right to control her own body. Therefore it is not the equivalent of abortion. Hear that Steve and Ten? Hear what? Murder is only legal with the consent of the mother?

To: tejek who wrote (230034)	4/20/2005 10:10:32 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573852

Just a moment now: You say that murder of the mother would also be murder of the fetus because it usually cannot survive without the mother, right? Thus you do agree that a fetus can be murdered, at least indirectly (collateral damage, eh?). Assuming you having said that a fetus can be murdered, how do you distinguish between the termination of the fetus by abortion only (not murder) or by other means (murder) like above? A fetus killed by action of a human thus sometimes is murder (you get the needle) and sometimes is abortion only (lawful), all according to the circumstances, right? Taro