SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (106394)6/22/2005 7:26:43 AM
From: arno  Respond to of 108807
 
edit



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (106394)6/22/2005 9:24:30 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
I don't consider your remarks flippant, and I understand what you are saying, but are you channeling Ted Nugent or what? The way you describe man is as some sort of savage, and I don't think we need to be like that in most ways, most of the time.

Regarding the effects of eating meat, it is not normal in a society for 50% of deaths to come from heart disease. This is a disease of heavy meat eaters, and several cancers and other serious disease are prominent in meat eaters. I don't know why you have never heard of this concept, but here is a recent book about it, The China Study. I've included an editorial review, but there is a lot more information there if you care to poke around. I will have to answer your other point, about whether man is a natural predator, a little later because I have to cook dinner (vegan hotdogs on whole wheat buns, mixed vegetable chips and organic grapes):

Editorial Reviews

Review

"[This] elaborate study of rural Chinese gives big points to the health value of their plant-based diets." —Chicago Tribune

Book Description

This exhaustive presentation of the findings from the China Study conclusively demonstrates the link between nutrition and heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Referred to as the "Grand Prix of epidemiology" by The New York Times, this study examines more than 350 variables of health and nutrition with surveys from 6,500 adults in 65 counties, representing 2,500 counties across rural China and Taiwan. While revealing that proper nutrition can have a dramatic effect on reducing and reversing these ailments as well as obesity, this text calls into question the practices of many of the current dietary programs, such as the Atkins diet, that enjoy widespread popularity in the West. The impact of the politics of nutrition and the efforts of special interest groups on the creation and dissemination of public information on nutrition are also discussed.

About the Author

T. Colin Campbell, PhD, is the project director of the China-Oxford-Cornell Diet and Health Project (the China Study), a 20-year study of nutrition and health. He is a Jacob Gould Schurman Professor Emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University. In more than 40 years of research he has received more than 70 grant-years of peer-reviewed research funding and authored more than 300 research papers. He lives in Ithaca, New York. Thomas M. Campbell II lives in Ithaca, New York.

The China Study, May 21, 2005
Reviewer: David Klein - See all my reviews

The China study is the most important book on nutrition and health to come out in the last 75 years. Everyone should read it and it should be the model for all nutrition programs taught at universities. The reading is engrossing if not astounding. The science is conclusive. Dr. Campbell's intregrity and commitment to truthful nutrition education shine through. I interviewed him yesterday and found him to be a warm, genuinely brilliant scientist and humanitarian who speaks only about the real facts. The science is clearly consulsive: the best diet for humans is the vegan diet. Vegan diet stops and reverses most diseases, rejueventes, slims the body and stops the needless slaughter of animals and ravaging effects of animal farming. Learn why vegan foods are nutritionally complete and how the US government and AMA have abused our trust, perverting the truth about nutrition all in the name of profiteering. Dr. Campbell is a hero who deserves our serious attention.

David Klein
Publisher/Editor of Living Nutrition Magazine
Sebastopol, California

amazon.com



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (106394)6/23/2005 12:34:05 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Now I am going to send you some brief articles from the web analyzing what man has in common both with meat-eating and vegetarian animals. While technically we are omniverous, did you know that throughout history there have been quite a few large vegetarian cultures? The vegetarians have tended to be the artistic subsets of society--the writers, painters, poets, and spiritual leaders. The meat eaters have tended to be the the capitalistic rich and those who emulate them, since meat has always been expensive, relative to grain and other plant foods. You need to actually click on the link at the bottom to see a comparative table of meat eating and plant eating animals, but the text is interesting as well:

What is our "Natural" Diet?
There has been much controversy recently over the diet most natural to people. We will first consider the arguments of those who feel that human beings are not naturally suited for a diet that includes flesh and other animal products.

The French naturalist Baron Cuvier stated: "Fruits, roots, and the succulent parts of vegetables appear to be the natural food of man." [1] Geoffrey Hodson quoted the great Swedish naturalist Linnaeus as follows: "Man's structure, external and internal, compared with the of other animals, shows that fruit and succulent vegetables constitute his natural food." [2] The following comparisons support these statements: [3]

1. Our small and large intestines, like those of other primates, are four times longer than those of carnivores. Because of the long intestines, meat passes very slowly through the human digestive system; it takes about 4 days during which the disease-causing products of decaying meat are in constant contact with the digestive organs (vegetarian food takes only about 1 1/2 days). [4]

2. Our hands are similar to those of apes; they are meant for picking food such as vegetables, fruits, leaves, flowers, seeds, etc., and not for tearing flesh.

3. Our lower jaw, or mandible, can move both up and down and side to side, like the primates'; carnivores' jaws move only up and down.

4. Our saliva is alkaline like that of the higher species of apes; it contains ptyalin to digest carbohydrates. Carnivores' saliva is acidic.

5. Unlike carnivores, we do not have fangs for biting into flesh. Our so-called canine teeth are not truly canine like the dog's. We are not constituted to prey upon animals, rip apart their bodies, or bite into their flesh.

6. Although our gastric secretions are acidic like that of carnivores, their stomachs have four times as much acid; this strong acidic region is necessary to digest their high-protein flesh diet.

7. Carnivores have proportionally larger kidneys and livers than we have; they need these larger organs in order to handle the excessive nitrogenous waste of a flesh diet.

8. The carnivores' livers secrete a far greater amount of bile into the gut to deal with their high-fat meat diet.



Table I (below) indicates that people are closest in structure to animals that primarily eat fruits.

TABLE 1
Structural Comparison of Humans to Animals

Meat eater Leaf-grass eater Fruit eater Human being
Has claws No claws No claws No claws
No pores on skin; perspires through tongue to cool body Perspires through milions of pores on skin Perspires through milions of pores on skin Perspires through milions of pores on skin
Sharp, pointed front teeth to tear flesh No sharp, pointed front teeth No sharp, pointed front teeth No sharp, pointed front teeth
Small salivary glands in the mouth (not needed to pre- digest grains and fruits Well-developed salivary glands needed to pre-digest grains amd fruits Well-developed salivary glands needed to pre-digest grains amd fruits Well-developed salivary glands needed to pre-digest grains amd fruits
Acid saliva Alkaline saliva Alkaline saliva Alkaline saliva
No flat, back molar teeth to grind food Flat, back molar teeth to grind food Flat, back molar teeth to grind food Flat, back molar teeth to grind food
Much strong hydrochloric acid in stomach to digest tough animal muscle, bone, etc. Stomach acid 20 times weaker than meat eaters Stomach acid 20 times weaker than meat eaters Stomach acid 20 times weaker than meat eaters
Intestinal tract only 3 times body length Intestinal tract 10 times body length Intestinal tract 10 times body length Intestinal tract 10 times body length
SOURCE: Barbara Parham, What's Wrong with Eating Meat?
Denver Colorado.,Ananda Marga Publications, 1979, pp. 10-11.
Reproduced with permission.



That our natural instinct is not toward flesh food is stated by R. H. Wheldon:

The gorge of a cat, for instance, will rise at the smell of a mouse or a piece of raw flesh, but not at the aroma of fruit. If a man can take delight in pouncing upon a bird, tear its still living body apart with his teeth, sucking the warm blood, one might infer that Nature had provided him with carnivorous instinct, but the very thought of doing such a thing makes him shudder. On the other hand, a bunch of luscious grapes makes his mouth water, and even in the absence of hunger, he will eat fruit to gratify taste.[5)]

Some scientists disagree with the above analysis.

They assert that people's natural diet is omnivorous, based on both flesh and vegetarian foods. They point to the many years that our ancestors have eaten meat and the fact that primates, the animals whose systems are closest to ours, have been observed to eat meat.

In response:

1. Certainly people have eaten meat for at least thousands of years. According to the Bible, after first giving people a vegetarian diet (Genesis 1:29), as a concession to human weakness, God gave people permission to eat meat in the time of Noah (Genesis 9:3). Just as an automobile will travel on a fuel which is not most suitable to it, people can live on a diet that is not ideal. The issue is not what people eat now and have eaten in the past, but the diet that is healthiest for people and is most consistent with our anatomy, physiology, and instincts. It should also be noted that a significant portion of people throughout history either ate no meat at all or ate it only on rare occasions. In addition, meat contains no essential nutrients that cannot be obtained from plant sources.

(2) With regard to primates eating meat, this issue has been hotly debated. Some species have never been observed to do so. Jane Goodall's studies of apes showed that meat eating incidents were extremely rare, and they were unusual and atypical of the species in general, occurring in un-chimplike surroundings. The staple diet of primates is vegetarian.

(A detailed analysis of this entire issue can be found in chapter 3, "The Aberrant Ape", in Food for a Future by Jon Wynne-Tyson (Thorsons, 1988).)

Even if people are naturally omnivorous, this means that we have a choice in our diet in terms of whether or not to eat meat. And it still leaves all the ethical arguments - compassion for animals, helping the hungry, protecting the environment - on the side of vegetarianism. Also, if we define our "natural" diet as that which is best for our health, there is abundant evidence that points to vegetarianism as our natural diet.

After a comprehensive analysis of this issue, a similar conclusion was reached by Sharon Bloyd-Pleshkin in her article, "In Search of Our Basic Diet". [6]. On the question of whether or not people are omnivores, she quotes Dr. Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine: "That depends on what you mean by `omnivore`; Does it mean what you tend to eat? Or what diet you do best on?" So, as Ms. Bloyd-Pleshkin concludes, while human beings are capable of ingesting a wide range of foods, including meat, and while they have been eating meat for the past 2 million years, "modern research shows that we do best on a diet with little or no animal protein and fat." [7]

Notes:

1. "Facts of Vegetarianism", North American Vegetarian Society pamphlet, (Box 72, Dolgeville, N. Y. 13329), p. 5.

2. Ibid.

3. M. M. Bhamgara, "Yoga and Diet", The Vegetarian Way, Proceedings of the 24th World Vegetarian Congress, Madras, India (1977), p. 137.

4. Barbara Parham, What`s Wrong With Eating Meat? (Denver, Colorado: Ananda Marga Publications, 1979), p. 23.

5. Dr. R. H. Wheldon, No Animal Food (New York: Heath Publishing Co.), p. 50, quoted by Nathaniel Altman, Eating for Life (Wheaton, Illinois: Theosophical Publishing House, 1977), p. 17.

6. Sharon Bloyd-Pleshkin, "In Search of Our basic Diet", Vegetarian Times, Issue 166, (June, 1991), pp. 46-55.

7. Ibid, p. 55.

jewishveg.com



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (106394)6/23/2005 12:42:57 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Here is more information about the differences between vegetarian and meat eating animals. Some of it is similar to the last article, but some of it is different. I think it is important to remember that from the archaeological record, it looks like early man hunted animals when there was a hope of catching one, and had lots of ritualized behaviors and customs around hunting, probably because it meant survival to these groups. But from teeth wear, we can see that he ate mostly grains and plant foods.

Of course now there is no need to eat meat, because we can survive quite well without it. Meat doesn't taste good to everyone, incidentally. Once I found out that pigs are smarter than my beloved dog, and can solve complex puzzles, bacon no longer tasted good to me. It was like eating my pet for breakfast. Once I found out that beef cows are fed chicken feces with dead chickens in it and cow blood, in addition to being shot full of antibiotics and contaminated with pesticides, steak didn't taste so good, either. Did you know that it takes 50,000 gallons of water to grow one pound of beef, incidentally? Meat production on the scale we are doing it is very bad environmentally. And unlike early man, who only ate meat occasionally, we eat it every day. So the health effects are much more deadly.

Humans are Not Designed to Eat Meat
Just because you can digest animals does not mean you are supposed to. You can digest cardboard. That does not mean you should eat it. And it also does not mean that you digest it well.
Our closest relatives are primates. Very few eat animals, and those who do typically stick to things like insects, not cows and pigs. Jane Goodall, famous for her extensive study of apes while living with them, found that it was very rare for the primates she saw to eat other animals.

As another author said, "The human body was not designed to catch or eat animals. You have no claws. Your teeth do not rend flesh. Your mouth can not seriously wound nor is it made to really get a good bite into an struggling victim like true carnivores can. You are not fit to run fast to catch prey. Meat-eaters have fast enough reflexes to ambush or overtake a victim. You do not. Try catching a pig or a chicken with your bare hands; see what happens."

Meat-Eaters

Carnivorous animals, including the lion, dog, wolf, cat, etc., have many unique characteristics which set them apart from all other members of the animal kingdom. They all possess a very simple and short digestive system -- only three times the length of their bodies. This is because flesh decays very rapidly, and the products of this decay quickly poison the bloodstream if they remain too long in the body. So a short digestive tract was evolved for rapid expulsion of putrefactive bacteria from decomposing flesh, as well as stomachs with ten times as much hydrochloric acid as non-carnivorous animals (to digest fibrous tissue and bones). Meat-eating animals that hunt in the cool of the night and sleep during the day when it is hot do not need sweat glands to cool their bodies; they therefore do not perspire through their skin, but rather they sweat through their tongues. On the other hand, vegetarian animals, such as the cow, horse, zebra, deer, etc., spend much of their time in the sun gathering their food, and they freely perspire through their skin to cool their bodies. But the most significant difference between the natural meat-eaters and other animals is their teeth. Along with sharp claws, all meat-eaters, since they have to kill mainly with their teeth, possess powerful jaws and pointed, elongated, "canine" teeth to pierce tough hide and to spear and tear flesh. They do NOT have molars (flat, back teeth) which vegetarian animals need for grinding their food. Unlike grains, flesh does not need to be chewed in the mouth to predigest it; it is digested mostly in the stomach and the intestines. A cat, for example, can hardly chew at all.

Plant-Eaters

Grass-and-leaf-eating animals (elephant, cow, sheep, llama, etc.) live on grass, herbs, and other plants, much of which is coarse and bulky. The digestion of this type of food starts in the mouth with the enzyme ptyalin in the saliva. these foods must be chewed well and thoroughly mixed with ptyalin in order to be broken down. For this reason, grass-and-leaf eaters have 24 special "molar" teeth and a slight side-to-side motion to grind their food, as opposed to the exclusively up-and-down motion of carnivores. They have no claws or sharp teeth; they drink by sucking water up into their mouths as opposed to lapping it up with their tongue which all meat eaters do. Since they do not eat rapidly decaying foods like the meat eaters, and since their food can take a longer time to pass through, they have much longer digestive systems -- intestines which are ten times the length of the body. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that a meat diet has an extremely harmful effect on these grass-and-leaf eaters. Dr. William Collins, a scientist in the New York Maimonedes Medical Center, found that the meat-eating animals have an "almost unlimited capacity to handle saturated fats and cholesterol". If a half pound of animal fat is added daily over a long period of time to a rabbit's diet, after two month his blood vessels become caked with fat and the serious disease called atheriosclerosis develops. human digestive systems, like the rabbit's, are also not designed to digest meat, and they become diseased the more they eat it, as we will later see.

Fruit-eaters include mainly the anthropoid apes, humanity's immediate animal ancestors. The diet of these apes consists mostly of fruit and nuts. Their skin has millions of pores for sweating, and they also have molars to grind and chew their food; their saliva is alkaline, and, like the grass-and-leaf eaters, it contains ptyalin for predigestion. Their intestines are extremely convoluted and are twelve times the length of their body, for the slow digestion of fruits and vegetables.

Human Beings

Human characteristics are in every way like the fruit eaters, very similar to the grass- eater, and very unlike the meat eaters, as is clearly shown in the table above. The human digestive system, tooth and jaw structure, and bodily functions are completely different from carnivorous animals. As in the case of the anthropoid ape, the human digestive system is twelve times the length of the body; our skin has millions of tiny pores to evaporate water and cool the body by sweating; we drink water by suction like all other vegetarian animals; our tooth and jaw structure is vegetarian; and our saliva is alkaline and contains ptyalin for predigestion of grains. Human beings clearly are not carnivores by physiology -- our anatomy and digestive system show that we must have evolved for millions of years living on fruits, nuts, grains, and vegetables.

Furthermore, it is obvious that our natural instincts are non-carnivorous. Most people have other people kill their meat for them and would be sickened if they had to do the killing themselves. Instead of eating raw meat as all flesh-eating animals do, humans boil, bake, or fry it and disguise it with all kinds of sauces and spices so that it bears no resemblance to its raw state. One scientist explains it this way: "A cat will salivate with hungry desire at the smell of a piece of raw flesh but not at all at the smell of fruit. If man could delight in pouncing upon a bird, tear its still-living limbs apart with his teeth, and suck the warm blood, one might conclude that nature provided him with meat-eating instinct. On the other hand, a bunch of luscious grapes makes his mouth water, and even in the absence of hunger he will eat fruit because it tastes so good."

Scientists and naturalists, including the great Charles Darwin who gave the theory of evolution, agree that early humans were fruit and vegetable eaters and that throughout history our anatomy has not changed. The great Swedish scientist von Linné states: "Man's structure, external and internal, compared with that of the other animals, shows that fruit and succulent vegetables constitute his natural food."

So it is clear from scientific studies that physiologically, anatomically, and instinctively, man is perfectly suited to a diet for fruit, vegetables, nuts, and grains. This is summarized in the table above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early Humans

Many scientists believe that early humans were largely vegetarian. See articles by David Popovich and Derek Wall.

Dr. John McDougall asserts that our early ancestors from at least four million years ago followed diets almost exclusively of plant foods. Of the races that followed them, many of which consumed meat, McDougall notes:

"Undoubtedly, all of these diets [meat-containing] were adequate to support growth and life to an age of successful reproduction. To bear and raise offspring you only need to live for 20 to 30 years, and fortuitously, the average life expectancy for these people was just that. The few populations of hunter-gatherers surviving into the 21 st Century are confined to the most remote regions of our planet &endash;- like the Arctic and the jungles of South America and Africa &endash;- some of the most challenging places to manage to survive. Their life expectancy is also limited to 25 to 30 years and infant mortality is 40% to 50%. 5 Hunter-gatherer societies fortunately did survive, but considering their arduous struggle and short lifespan, I would not rank them among successful societies."

michaelbluejay.com



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (106394)6/23/2005 12:56:58 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
You questioned the research about links between meat eating and disease, which surprises me because they are well known. Not to mention that mad cow is almost certainly deeply embedded the American beef cattle, and the government is doing nothing to discover it.

This information is from the pharmacy section of Kroger drug stores, a branch of the supermarket chain. This is definitely middle of the road health advice offered by a company that sells plenty of meat for a living, and they mention many increased health risks across a wide variety of diseases for meat eaters:

Health Benefits & Concerns for Meat and Poultry

Skip to:
Health benefits and concerns
Atherosclerosis

The most important dietary changes to make in protecting arteries from atherosclerosis include avoiding sources of saturated fat, such as meat and dairy products. A decrease in atherosclerosis resulting from a pure vegetarian diet (no meat, poultry, dairy or eggs), combined with exercise and stress reduction, has been proven by medical research. So-called “Mediterranean” diets (high in beans and peas, fish, fruit, vegetables, bread, and cereals; and low in meat, dairy fat, and eggs) have also had remarkable effects in reducing the risk of dying from heart disease.

Cancer

Research suggests that consumption of meat and other animal products may increase the risk of colon cancer, particularly if the meat is overcooked. Compared with meat eaters, most, but not all, studies have found vegetarians are less likely to be diagnosed with cancer. Female vegetarians have been reported to have lower estrogen levels compared with meat-eating women, possibly explaining a lower incidence of uterine and breast cancers.

The following two possibilities are both strongly supported by research findings:

Some foods consumed by vegetarians may protect against cancer.

Eating meat may increase the risk of cancer.

Breast and Colon Cancer (in relation to how meat is cooked)

Most, but not all, studies show meat-eaters have a high risk of colon and breast cancers. In some colon-cancer studies, the association has been limited to consumption of sausage or other processed meats.

The association between cancer and consumption of meat depends in part on how well the meat is cooked. Well-done meat contains more carcinogenic material than does lightly cooked meat. Recent evidence from preliminary studies shows that people who eat well-done, fried, or heavily browned meat have a high risk of colon and breast cancers.

However, not every report has found that exposure to carcinogens found in well-done meat leads to an increased risk of cancer. Some studies may have failed to find this link because they did not consider the effect of genetics. Susceptibility to the colon cancer-causing effects of well-cooked meat appears to be genetically determined. Genetics may also determine whether eating well-done meat increases the risk of breast cancer. As with colon cancer, genetic testing to determine which consumers of well-done meat are at high risk of breast cancer is rarely done except in research trials.

Most doctors tell people wishing to reduce their risk of breast and colon cancers to stop eating meat, or at least significantly reduce consumption, and to limit intake to meat that is rare or medium-cooked. Removing all meat from the diet may be the safest option, because consumption of even rare or medium-cooked meat has been associated with at least some increase in risk.

Prostate Cancer (in relation to how meat is cooked)

Meat contains high amounts of arachidonic acid. Some by-products of arachidonic acid have promoted prostate cancer in animals. Preliminary reports have suggested that frequently eating well-done steak or cured meats may also increase the risk of prostate cancer in men, although the association between prostate cancer and other meats has not been consistently reported.

Lung Cancer (in relation to how meat is cooked)

Consumption of fried and well-done red meat was associated with an elevated risk of lung cancer in one report. Consumption of red meat in general, as well as fried meat, correlated with a high risk of lung cancer in another study. People who cook with fat taken from meat (such as bacon fat and lard) may also be at high risk of lung cancer, according to preliminary research.

In one report, high consumption of hot dogs was associated with an almost tenfold increase in the risk of childhood leukemia when compared with low consumption. In another report, maternal consumption of hot dogs and childhood consumption of hamburgers or hot dogs at least once per week were associated with a doubling of the risk of cancers in children. A review of nine studies found an association between consumption by pregnant women of cured meat and the risk of brain cancer in their offspring. These associations do not yet constitute proof that eating hot dogs or hamburgers causes cancer in children, and evidence linking cured meat consumption to childhood cancers remains somewhat inconsistent.

In the report studying the effects of eating hot dogs and hamburgers, the association between meat eating and leukemia was weakest among children who took vitamin supplements, suggesting that these supplements may have had a protective effect. Processed meats such as hot dogs contain nitrates and nitrites—precursors to carcinogens. Antioxidants found in multivitamins keep nitrates and nitrites from converting into those carcinogens. Therefore, the association between vitamin consumption in children and protection against childhood cancers remains plausible, though unproven.

In the debate over whether dietary fat increases breast cancer risks, only one fact is indisputable: women in countries that consume high amounts of meat and dairy fat have a high risk of breast cancer, while women in countries that mostly consume rice, soy, vegetables and fish (instead of meat and dairy fat) have a low risk of breast cancer.

Cardiovascular Disease

A diet high in fish appears protective against heart disease, while a high intake of saturated fat (found in meat) may contribute to heart disease. A large study of male healthcare professionals found that those men eating mostly a “prudent” diet (high in fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fish, and poultry) had a 30 percent lower risk of heart attacks compared to men who ate the fewest foods in the “prudent” category. In contrast, men who ate the highest percentage of their foods from the “typical American diet” category (high in red meat, processed meat, refined grains, sweets, and desserts) had a 64 percent increased risk of heart attack, compared to men who ate the fewest foods in that category.

Crohn’s Disease

As with many other health conditions, it may be beneficial for persons with this condition to eat less meat and dairy fat and more fruits and vegetables.

Diabetes

Vegetarians have been reported to have a low risk of type 2 diabetes. When people with diabetic nerve damage switch to a vegan diet (no meat, dairy, or eggs), improvements have been reported after several days. In one trial, pain completely disappeared in 17 of 21 people. Fats from meat also cause heart disease, the leading killer of people with diabetes. Vegetarians eat less protein than do meat eaters. Reducing protein intake has lowered kidney damage caused by diabetes, and may also improve glucose tolerance. Diets high in fat, especially saturated fat, worsen glucose tolerance and increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. Worldwide, children whose energy comes primarily from a diet high in dairy (or meat) products have a significantly higher chance of developing type 1 diabetes than do children whose energy comes primarily from a diet high in vegetable sources.

Diverticular Disease

One study of food intake revealed a 50 percent increase in incidence of diverticular disease in persons eating a diet high in meat and low in vegetables relative to those eating a high-vegetable and low-meat diet.

Fibrocystic Breast Disease (FBD)

Fibrocystic disease has been linked to estrogen imbalance in the body. When women with fibrocystic disease eat a low-fat diet, their estrogen levels decrease. After three to six months, the pain and lumpiness of FBD also decreases, according to some research. The link between fat and FBD symptoms appears to be most strongly related to saturated fat, which is high in meat.

Gallstones

In some trials, vegetarians had only half the risk of developing gallstones compared with meat eaters. Vegetarians often eat fewer calories and less cholesterol. They also tend to weigh less than meat eaters. All of these differences may reduce gallstone incidence.

Gout

Restricting purine intake can reduce the risk of a gout attack in people susceptible to gout. Foods high in purines include protein-rich foods, such as sweetbreads, liver, and other organ meats, and red meat.

Halitosis

Access by oral bacteria to sulfur-containing amino acids enhances the production of the sulfur gases partially responsible for bad breath. Cleaning the mouth after eating sulfur-rich food, including meat, may help remove the food for these bacteria.

Heart Attack

Dietary fat consumption increases heart attack risk. The Nurses’ Health Study found that eating foods high in saturated fats (meat and dairy fat) was directly associated with more nonfatal heart attacks and deaths from coronary heart disease than eating lower amounts of these foods. Other studies report a direct association between frequent consumption of meat and butter and heart attacks. Making positive dietary changes immediately following a heart attack is likely to decrease one’s chance of having a second heart attack. In one study, people began eating more vegetables and fruits, and substituted fish, nuts, and legumes for meat and eggs 24 to 48 hours after a heart attack. Six weeks later, the diet group had significantly fewer fatal and nonfatal heart attacks than a similar group who did not make these dietary changes. Many doctors tell people trying to reduce their risk of heart disease to avoid all meat and dairy fat. Fish is often suggested instead of meat. People eating a “Mediterranean” diet (high in beans and peas, fish, fruit, vegetables, bread, and cereals; and low in meat, dairy fat, and eggs) for two years had a remarkable 70 percent reduced risk of dying from heart disease compared with people not eating the diet. Similar results were also confirmed after almost four years.

High Cholesterol

Significant amounts of saturated fat are found in beef, pork, and veal. Avoiding these foods reduces cholesterol levels and has even been reported to reverse existing heart disease. Vegetarians have lower cholesterol and less heart disease than meat eaters, in part because they avoid animal fat. Vegans (people who eat no meat, dairy, or eggs) have the lowest cholesterol levels, and switching from a standard diet to a vegan diet has been reported to reverse heart disease.

High Homocysteine

People with high-homocysteine levels are typically advised to reduce their consumption of meat and saturated fat, because these dietary changes lower the risk of heart disease. Since homocysteine is produced from the amino acid methionine, intake of large amounts of methionine increases homocysteine levels. Foods high in methionine that have also been linked with an increased risk of heart disease include meat and eggs. The extent to which consumption of these foods affects the risk of heart disease as a result of their methionine content remains unknown.

High Triglycerides

People with high triglycerides are typically advised to reduce their weight and limit the consumption of meat and saturated fats. Many doctors recommend a diet low in saturated fat (meaning avoidance of red meat and all dairy except nonfat dairy) to reduce triglycerides and the risk of heart disease.

Hives

Allergy to foods and food additives is a common cause of hives, especially in chronic cases. Cured meat is among the foods most commonly reported as a trigger for hives.

Intermittent Claudication

Important dietary changes for preventing atherosclerosis (and, consequently, intermittent claudication) include avoiding meat and dairy fat, increasing fiber, and possibly avoiding foods containing trans fatty acids.

Iron Deficiency

The most absorbable form of iron, called “heme” iron, is found in meat, poultry, and fish.

Kidney Stones

Increased levels of urinary calcium also increase the risk of stone formation. Consumption of animal protein from meat, dairy, poultry, or fish increases urinary calcium.

Morning Sickness

In a Harvard study, women with a high intake of saturated fat (found mainly in meat and dairy) during the year prior to pregnancy had a much higher risk of severe morning sickness than did women eating less saturated fat.

Osteoarthritis (OA)

From the 1950s through the 1970s, Dr. Max Warmbrand used a diet free of meat, poultry, dairy, chemicals, sugar, eggs, and processed foods for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and OA, claiming significant anecdotal success. He reported that clinical results took at least six months to develop. The Warmbrand diet has never been properly tested in clinical research. Moreover, although the diet is healthful and should reduce the risk of being diagnosed with many other diseases, it is difficult for most people to follow. This difficulty, plus the lack of published research, leads many doctors who are aware of the Warmbrand diet to use it only if other approaches have failed.

Parasites

Undercooked meat and poultry can contain parasites.

Phenylketonuria (PKU)

A PKU diet is one that is low in protein, providing no more than the minimum amount of phenylalanine needed by the body. All high-protein foods, such as meats and poultry, are usually eliminated.

Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)

Several studies suggest that diets low in fat may help to reduce symptoms of PMS. Many doctors recommend diets very low in meat and dairy fat and high in fruit, vegetables, and whole grains for women with PMS.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

From the 1950s through the 1970s, Max Warmbrand, a naturopathic doctor, used a very low-fat diet to treat people with RA. He recommended a diet free of meat, dairy, chemicals, sugar, eggs, and processed foods. See Osteoarthritis (above).

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

An isolated case of someone with SLE improving significantly after the introduction of a vegetarian diet has been reported. In Japan, women who frequently ate fatty meats, such as beef and pork, were reported to be at higher risk for SLE compared with women eating little of these foods. Consuming fewer calories, less fat, and foods low in phenylalanine and tyrosine (prevalent in high-protein foods such as meat and dairy) might be helpful, according to animal and preliminary human studies.

Weight Loss

For weight loss, foods with a high proportion of calories from fat should be eliminated from the diet, or consumed only in limited amounts; these include red meat, poultry skins, and dark poultry meat.

Wilson’s Disease

Most foods contain at least some copper, so it is not possible to avoid the metal completely. Foods high in copper, such as organ meats, should be eliminated from the diet.

kroger.com