Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (163899)	7/5/2005 4:01:41 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

You yourself admitted that you were wrong here and that AMD was nowhere near having negative total earnings over 36 years: Fair enough. For the record, I did not exceed $272.6 million in earnings last week. Message 21475453 For the record, you originally stated: with 2005's losses, AMD is in a position to be a net loser over it's entire Corporate history going back 36 years. When I saw that statement a few days ago, I did a quick check of cumulative earnings in the 10Q and knew that you were wrong, but let it roll. Then I saw you constantly repeating the lie, so I told you so. Eraser proved that you can't ADD, or you chose not to try. Also, Kanellos' article was based on his own estimates for 2003 that you did not even bother to check. To repeat Eraser's conclusion on this matter: I can't put much faith in the judgement of someone who can't use simple addition and subtraction to calculate AMD's net income over the past 36 years before making comparisons to his last week's paycheck. And you're telling ME to "do the math?" Petz