SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve dietrich who wrote (692460)7/18/2005 2:27:13 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 769670
 
"Sadly, the underlying issue is lost on the general populace, who have show willingness to accept what ever rationale of the day that Bush offers for being in Iraq."

I don't get why folks who oppose Bush & Saddam's removal have
to change the parameters of the debate when the available
evidence fails to support their POV. Why not search for the
truth, accept it & debate your positions from there?

**Duelfer Report = Iraq Survey Group**

Duelfer Report: Saddam Planned to Restart WMD Programs
Message 20611962

No one could read even a small portion of the report and conclude that "Iraq had no WMDs" is a fair summary of its contents.
Message 20615946

SADDAM Hussein believed that the United Nations system was so corrupt that it would protect his dictatorship from American aggression and allow him to complete quickly his quest for weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Message 20619450

The Report That Nails Saddam
Message 20622263

Duelfer also reported that Saddam asked subordinates how long it would take to develop chemical weapons once sanctions ended.
Message 20623841

Kay stated, "I must say I actually think Iraq -
what we learned during the inspections - made Iraq a more
dangerous place potentially than in fact we thought it was
even before the war".....
dev.siliconinvestor.com

The head of the U.S. team conducting the search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq announced on Thursday that his group has uncovered at least ten more artillery shells filled with banned chemical weapons and is finding new WMD evidence "almost every day."
Message 20273691

Kay says some Iraq weapons in Syria: report
Message 19729605

Saddam agents on Syria border helped move banned materials
Message 20420930

Iraq Hid Nuclear Program Intending On Rebuilding It
Message 20565683

Evidence Iraq Had Deal To Buy Uranium From Congo: Butler Report
dev.siliconinvestor.com
Message 20315956

Wilson now says Iraq DID seek uranium from Niger, Africa
Message 20081121

Uh huh, It's always been about "stockpiles" of WMD's &
absolutely nothing else........
Message 20911765

Saddam Funded Terrorists - Duelfer Report
dev.siliconinvestor.com

Inspections + Verification
Message 20620056

Duelfer Report: Saddam Bribed Jacques Chirac To Veto War
Message 20611925

DAVID KAY: In my judgment, based on the work that has been
done to this point of the Iraq Survey Group, and in fact,
that I reported to you in October, Iraq was in clear
violation of the terms of [U.N.] Resolution 1441.

Resolution 1441 required that Iraq report all of its
activities -- one last chance to come clean about what it
had.

We have discovered hundreds of cases, based on both
documents, physical evidence and the testimony of Iraqis,
of activities that were prohibited under the initial U.N.
Resolution 687 and that should have been reported under
1441, with Iraqi testimony that not only did they not tell
the U.N. about this, they were instructed not to do it and
they hid material.....

....the unparalleled looting and destruction, a lot of which
was directly intentional, designed by the security services
to cover the tracks of the Iraq WMD program and their other
programs as well....

Message 19757713

David Kay: ".......All I can say is if you read the total body of intelligence in the last 12 to 15 years that flowed on Iraq, I quite frankly think it would be hard to come to a conclusion other than Iraq was a gathering, serious threat to the world with regard to WMD."

In fact, David Kay just last fall said that the Iraq Survey Group, quote, "discovered sufficient evidence to date to conclude that the Iraqi regime was committed to delivery system improvements that would have, if Operation Iraqi Freedom had not occurred, dramatically breached U.N. restrictions placed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War."

We have also found that Iraq had plans and advanced design work for a liquid-propellant missile with ranges of up to 1,000 kilometers; activity that Iraq did not report to the U.N. and which could have placed large portions of the Middle East in jeopardy.

We have confirmed that Iraq had new work under way on prohibited solid-propellant missiles that were also concealed from the United Nations.

Significantly, the Iraq Survey Group has also confirmed prewar intelligence that Iraq was in secret negotiations with North Korea to obtain some of its most dangerous missile technology.

Message 19774077

DAVID KAY: I think Iraq was a dangerous place becoming more
dangerous, because, in fact, what we observe is that the
regime itself was coming apart. It was descending into
worse the part of moral depravity and corruption. Saddam
was isolated in a fantasy land capable of wreaking
tremendous harm and terror on his individual citizens, but
corruption, money gain was the root cause.

At the same time that we know there were terrorist groups
in state still seeking WMD capability. Iraq, although I
found no weapons, had tremendous capabilities in this
area. A marketplace phenomena was about to occur, if it
did not occur; sellers meeting buyers. And I think that
would have been very dangerous if the war had not
intervened.....

....Iraq remained a very dangerous place in terms of WMD
capabilities, even though we found no large stockpiles of
weapons.....

Message 19757678

Last fall the Iraqi Survey Group uncovered, quote, "significant information, including research and development of biological weapons, applicable organisms, the involvement of the Iraqi intelligence service in possible biological weapons activities and deliberate concealment activities."

All of this suggests that Iraq, after 1996, further compartmentalized its program and focused on maintaining smaller covert capabilities that could be activated quickly to surge the production of biological weapons agents.

The Iraq Survey Group found a network of laboratories and safe houses controlled by Iraqi intelligence and security services that contained equipment for chemical and biological research and a prison laboratory complex possibly used in human testing for biological weapons agents that were not declared to the United Nations.....

.......Before I leave the biological weapons story, an important fact that you must consider: For years the U.N. searched unsuccessfully for Saddam's biological weapons program. His son-in-law, Hussein Kamil, who controlled the hidden program, defected and only then was the world able to confirm that Iraq indeed had an active and dangerous biological weapons program.

Message 19774132

Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, said,
"a threat remains that chemical weapons could be used against
U.S. and coalition forces, noting information from earlier
this year that Iraqi scientists had linked up with foreign
terrorists in Iraq. A series of raids beginning last March,
Duelfer said, prevented the problem from 'becoming a major
threat."

and....

""Hussein's government retained data and personnel
knowledgeable about weapons, and used funds from the Oil for
Food relief program to upgrade his chemical industry so that
weapons materials could be produced once sanctions ended."

Message 20616191

David Kay: ".......Iraq was in clear and material violation of 1441. They maintained programs and activities, and they certainly had the intentions at a point to resume their program. So there was a lot they wanted to hide because it showed what they were doing that was illegal. I hope we find even more evidence of that."

"The world is far safer with the disappearance and removal of Saddam Hussein"

"I think the world is far safer with the disappearance and the removal of Saddam Hussein. I have said I actually think this may be one of those cases where it was even more dangerous than we thought. I think when we have the complete record you're going to discover that after 1998 it became a regime that was totally corrupt. Individuals were out for their own protection. And in a world where we know others are seeking WMD, the likelihood at some point in the future of a seller and a buyer meeting up would have made that a far more dangerous country than even we anticipated with what may turn out not to be a fully accurate estimate."....

Senator McCain: "So the point is, if he were in power today, there is no doubt that he would harbor ambitions for the development and use of weapons of mass destruction. Is there any doubt in your mind?"

David Kay: "There's absolutely no doubt. And I think I've said that, Senator."....

Senator Clinton: "I think that rightly does raise questions that we should be examining about whether or not the U.N. inspection process pursuant to 1441 might not also have worked without the loss of life that we have confronted both among our own young men and women, as well as Iraqis."

David Kay: "Well, Senator Clinton, let me just add to that. We have had a number of Iraqis who have come forward and said, 'We did not tell the U.N. about what we were hiding, nor would we have told the U.N. because we would run the risk of our own' --

I think we have learned things that no U.N. inspector would have ever learned given the terror regime of Saddam and the tremendous personal consequences that scientists had to run by speaking the truth." That's not to say, and it's not incompatible with the fact that inspections accomplish a great deal in holding a program down. And that's where the surprise is. In holding the program down, in keeping it from break out, I think the record is better than we would have anticipated. I don't think the record is necessarily better than we thought with regard to getting the final truth, because of the power of the terrorist state that Saddam Hussein had."

Message 19757747

RUMSFELD: It's a difficult task.

Think: It took us 10 months to find Saddam Hussein. The
reality is that the hole he was found hiding in was large
enough to hold enough biological weapons to kill thousands
of human beings. Our people had gone past that farm
several times; had no idea he was there.

And unlike Saddam Hussein, such objects once buried can
stay buried. In a country the size of California, the
chances of inspectors finding something buried in the
ground without their being led to it by people
knowledgeable about where it was is minimal.

Message 19771164

Text of UN Resolution 687 AKA "The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement.
dalebroux.com

UN Resolution 1441
un.int



To: steve dietrich who wrote (692460)7/18/2005 4:35:35 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 769670
 
Bush qualifies pledge to fire CIA leaker

By Patricia Wilson
news.yahoo.com

President Bush on Monday shifted from a broad pledge to fire whoever leaked a covert CIA agent's identity, by vowing to dismiss any person found in federal probe to have committed a crime.

Bush, whose top political adviser Karl Rove has been caught up in the controversy, told reporters he did not know all the facts and urged them to wait until the inquiry was complete before "you jump to conclusions."

"I would like this to end as quickly as possible so we know the facts, and if someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration," Bush said at a news conference with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Asked on June 10, 2004, whether he stood by his earlier pledge to fire anyone found to have leaked the officer's name, Bush replied: "Yes." On Monday, he added the qualifier that it would have to be shown that a crime was committed.

The Democratic Party accused Bush of lowering the "ethics bar" in his new comments.

Bush, saying there was a "serious ongoing" inquiry under way into who revealed the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame, refused as he did last week to comment on specifics of the case.

"I want to know all the facts," he said. "The best place for the facts to be done is by somebody who is spending time investigating it."

It is against the law for a government official to knowingly expose a covert CIA agent.

Rove has been named by a Time magazine reporter as one of the sources who identified the agent to the media, before she was named in a newspaper column in July 2003.

Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, has said his client "has been repeatedly assured he is not a target of the investigation" by a special prosecutor into the leak.

The Time reporter, Matthew Cooper, said Rove was the first person to tell him that the agent, who is married to a prominent critic of the Bush administration's Iraq policy, worked for the CIA.

Cooper said he told a grand jury last week that Rove told him the woman worked at the "agency," or CIA, on weapons of mass destruction issues, and ended the call by saying "I've already said too much."

He said Rove did not disclose the woman's name, but told him information would be declassified that would cast doubt on the credibility of her husband, former diplomat Joseph Wilson, who had charged the Bush administration with exaggerating the threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction programs in making its case for war.

Wilson accuses the Bush administration of leaking his wife's name in retribution.

Prominent Democrats have called on Bush to fire Rove, the architect of his two presidential election victories and now his deputy chief of staff, or block his access to classified information.

Some Republicans have sprung to Rove's defense, saying he did not break any laws because he did not reveal her name and may not have known she had undercover status.

"Faced with a question about whether or not he will keep his promise to fire those involved in leaking the identity of an undercover CIA agent while we are at war, President Bush backed away from his initial pledge and lowered the ethics bar," Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean said.

"Bush should be prepared to keep his word, and to enforce a high standard of ethics in the White House as he promised from the beginning of his administration."

Copyright © 2005 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Copyright © 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.