SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (21744)7/26/2005 10:59:50 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Biologically speaking, this is true and in fact in some cases the woman's body moves in to kill the fetus as it would with any foreign invasion. Doctors typically give drugs to lower the immune functions to save the fetus, though of course that has side effects.



To: Solon who wrote (21744)7/26/2005 11:08:05 AM
From: exdaytrader76  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
You seize upon the pro-choice propaganda as ultimate truth. Why is a baby a parasite? Because it does not contribute and depends upon the mother? That's what babies do - in and out of the womb.

Why can't a woman have the right to kill a third-trimester fetus? Is it not a "parasite?" Do you support third-trimester abortions? Is it not still HERBODYHERCHOICE?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News