Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (40696)	9/5/2005 9:23:14 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

you don't seem to be able to accept that re is slowing or am I not reading you right? In CA there is no doubt that RE is declining.

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (40696)	9/6/2005 1:32:10 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

>>the retiring plans for 79 million people will be altered for good<< Yes and no....NO wasn't exactly a retirement haven! Florida will take a hit, though....hmmm Tucumcari looking better and better, as is Danville, Phoenix and <gulp>Las Vegas!<G>

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (40696)	9/6/2005 12:16:34 PM
From: John Vosilla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

"what will happen is that the retiring plans for 79 million people will be altered for good... for some, these considerations had not even entered the radar screen... now, the lack of exposure to natural disasters, AND the fiscal responsibility of each locale (scrutiny of state & city governments fiscal performance) will be incredibly important" Bingo. Funny to see Lizzie arguing with you about California. That isn't going to be the story and neither is Florida, Las Vegas or Phoenix. Property values in overpriced areas and areas exposed to hurricanes and social unrest will take a dive. Many sleeper areas as you say are at the beginning stage of a 20-30 year explosion