Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (171859)	10/4/2005 1:41:18 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

UN condemns Iraq charter change The United Nations has criticised changes to Iraq's electoral law that make it harder for Iraqis to reject the draft constitution. The two-thirds majority needed in three provinces to defeat the constitution will now be counted from all registered - as opposed to actual - voters. On Sunday Shia and Kurdish members of parliament pushed through the changes in the referendum rules on 15 October. Sunni Arabs reacted angrily to the amendments on Monday. They believed many registered voters may not show up at the polls because of violence. "We have expressed our position to the national assembly and to the leadership of the government," said Jose Aranaz, a legal adviser to the UN electoral team in Iraq, in an interview with Reuters news agency. Mr Aranaz said parliament's decision was unacceptable and would not meet international standards. "Hopefully by tomorrow the situation will be clarified," he said. 'Forgery' Many Sunni Arabs oppose the draft constitution on the grounds that its federal provisions could lead to the break-up of Iraq. They are the majority in three Iraqi provinces, but largely boycotted the general election in January this year. The drafting of a constitution and a national vote on it, were meant to draw Sunni Iraqis into the political process, thereby reducing support for the mainly Sunni backed insurgency. On Monday Saleh al-Mutlaq, of the Sunni group Iraqi National Dialogue, called the change the voting law a "clear forgery". "They want this constitution to pass despite the will of the people," he added. The interim constitution drawn up under US administrator Paul Bremer in 2003 says the following about the issue: "The general referendum will be successful and the draft constitution ratified if a majority of the voters in Iraq approve and if two-thirds of the voters in three or more governorates do not reject it." But on Sunday, MPs said a No vote from two-thirds of "registered" voters was needed for a veto. The new interpretation keeps the clause stipulating that only half of actual voters are needed for the text to be adopted. Story from BBC NEWS: news.bbc.co.uk ------------- Corruption? Stacking the deck? Revenge? Power play? Hey, the one person who seems to be having a great time is...Chalabi. Convicted felon, Iranian spy, liar.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (171859)	10/4/2005 6:49:52 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

1) The US homeland has not been attaked in the four years since 2001, although terror leaders had promised there would be more attacks. 2) No Muslim government has fallen to the Islamist terror movement, though we know that was one of their key goals. 3) Two former terror supporting governments have been toppled, Saddam's and the Taliban. 4) Two governments (Pakistan and Saudi Arabia) which had been in a defacto truce (we leave you alone if you leave us alone) with the Islamist terror movement have been forced to change their policy and are now engaged in active violent struggle against it. 5) Libya has abandoned its WMD programs, allowed US inspectors to enter the country and remove WMD materials to Oak Ridge TN for destruction. We all know what Kaddafi said about what swayed his decision. 6) NK has recently promised to abandon its nuclear weapon program. 7) A new international anti-proliferation coalition, the Proliferation Security Initiative, has been formed. I don't think anyone can dispute the accuracy of the above statements. I also don't think anyone can dispute that these achievements are very good for the US. IMO few if any of them would have happened but for Bush's resolve.