Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (255066)	10/12/2005 10:39:19 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573097

"Unborn children" is a contradiction in terms. If they're unborn, they don't exist yet. The word children means a young already born human being in the world walking around. You just tripped yourself up and exposed yourself as a liar. dictionary.reference.com # 1. An unborn infant; a fetus. 2. An infant; a baby. Show me my lie. You can't. Of course unborn children cannot exist in your position of murder. Again, your statements are all over. Now you are advocating it's ok to murder a one year old since he is not "walking around". Even Edwards "use" to believe in unborn children: nrlc.org "She speaks to you through me," Edwards told the jury. "And I have to tell you right now - - I didn't plan to talk about this - - right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you." If you want to be accurate, then you would say "fertilized eggs with the potential to someday be a human". But we eat fertilized eggs for breakfast all the time. I value an unborn child a lot more than a fertilized chicken egg. I can't believe you think they are the same... If you know anything about biology you know at very early stages of pregnancies there is little difference between species. Poetnail huamsna ren't much different than tadpoles. The "human" part comes much later, when the spinal cord then brain start to form. That is about 5 months into term. A child is created at conception. Only thing needed after that is time and nourishment to develop. Everything is already there in the unborn child. 5 months you decide it's a child? Check out 8 weeks: priestsforlife.org Check out 10 weeks: priestsforlife.org Following your logic, I guess sperm shots are also thousands of human beings, right? Because they have the potential to be human. But potential is only potential. It's not real yet. And may never be. You can't follow logic. I said a child is created at conception. What part of that do you not understand? You tell me this isn't an unborn child at 10 weeks? priestsforlife.org