Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (4259)	10/13/2005 6:48:54 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 540796

Obviously, a pro-American pollster would have come up with a higher number for their President. Funny, although, there's probably a bit of truth in that, when there is a margin of error, how is it reported? But outside the margin of error, they're shooting the messenger.

To: Dale Baker who wrote (4259)	10/13/2005 6:55:37 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 540796

I think I may have stumbled onto something useful. I scan the Free Republic site regularly, several times a day. The way Free Republic works is, you post a news article, and them everybody comments on it. They don't have long-lived threads like SI. Once the thread vanishes below the front page, it's pretty much gone forever. You're supposed to post the articles with their original headlines. I had observed but never really thought about the fact that many articles are posted with "barf alert!" attached. All of a sudden it hit me! "Barf alert" is intended to cue readers to the fact that they should be outraged by the article. And then I realized that most of what is posted on Free Republic is expressions of outrage. Same with Democratic Underground. A similar story could be told for Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and Al Franken. They live to provoke outrage, outrage at "them," whoever "they" are. Apparently the country is full of people who have a lot of free-floating hostility and need a target. I suppose the same thing could be said about the world in general, might explain the popularity of Osama bin Laden.

To: Dale Baker who wrote (4259)	10/13/2005 9:05:32 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 540796

Obviously if you are "proAmerican" you slant things in a way positive for this administration- which clearly is perfectly synonymous with "America". Was there ever anything so stupid? America is the sum total of its population- it is not any one administration, or any one POV. Disagreeing with the administration does not make one "AntiAmerican". What I cannot quite get over is the fact that so many on the right see any form of disagreement as "AntiAmerican". It's so ludicrous in a country with two parties that they see things this way I can't quite figure out how they arrive at that. On top of the ludicrousness, it's really really ugly, and dangerous.