Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (176840)	12/2/2005 3:13:36 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We are taking sly, goede, chris as representatives of the liberal community. They are on the edges. Most dems are as confused as we are by what to do. Schumer on Imus said that three state may be the only way to go. I am yelling for timetables which seemed so radical 6 months ago but now is so conservative given murthas call. The old slogans from 2002 dont work for any of us. They are as foreign to the current predicament as vietnam and korea are. It will take a smart cookie to get us out with the best possible result. mike

To: Brumar89 who wrote (176840)	12/2/2005 4:11:14 PM
From: Lou Weed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

<<It seems pretty clear to me the overriding opposition to Bush and his administration is so strong on the left that ... yes, they are willing to be defacto pro-Saddam.>> No-one is WILLING to be defacto pro-Saddam.....they're pro Saddam in your head because they disagree with this admin's war and your point of view. This is precisely why the current environment is so polarized. This all too common "unpatriotic" or "pro-Saddam" cry is so overused and pathetic at this point. You make some good points for your argument but then you slip a statement like that in and its all for naught! MON