SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (11317)2/8/2006 6:28:04 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541627
 
Do you think there is a solution to economic disparity?

Sure, there's a solution. Problem is that the only way to achieve it is worse than the problem it solves. First you set up a totalitarian government, ban private property and business transaction, hire half the population to keep an eye on the other half, etc, etc.

or is that just one of those intractable and unfortunate things?

In a certain sense it is a necessary and desirable thing. There will always be some people better off than other people. It has to be that way unless you go with option A above. The question is when economic disparity becomes unhealthy. IMO, it's unhealthy when it is rigid, like a caste system, and it's unhealthy if the gap is so great and the underprivileged so many that you have civil unrest. IMO the solution to that is a strong economy, equal opportunity, and available information on making good choices.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (11317)2/8/2006 10:12:02 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541627
 
I personally like the solutions of the socialist democracies in Europe. As the 43 page (:-) article I posted showed, those democracies have much smaller disparities than the US has.