SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (11960)2/14/2006 6:30:31 PM
From: Sultan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 540831
 
If US had stayed after them in Afghanistan and really gone after them world wide with all the good will and resource at their command, Al Qaeda be a footnote.. Iraq created a monster..



To: Dale Baker who wrote (11960)2/14/2006 6:38:50 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540831
 
Muqtada Al-Sadr and the insurgents are not Al Qaeda folks. They are local Iraqis and they want the US out of their country. The Al Qaeda folks did not exist in Iraq under Saddam. They entered Iraq after the US went in. And they entered in pursuit of the US troops.

But then after the Jordanian hotel bombings, Al Qaeda fell silent. They were silenced by the Jordanians.

It is important to distinguish between the home grown insurgency which wants the military out of their country and the Al Qaeda who are foreigners.

When Bush and Cheney tell the American people that after the US troops leave Iraq, Al Qaeda will take over, it is a false statement made deliberately by Bush to mislead (Weapons of Mis Direction)the American people.

Are you aware that currently, the US is negotiating behind the scenes with insurgents and that is why there is relative peace in Iraq. Bush wants to get out of Iraq by handing it to the Iraqis. Doing so will free him up to deal with Iran.

So let us ask, why is it that Bush kept lying to us that Al Qaeda will take over Iraq when he knew all along that it is not true?



To: Dale Baker who wrote (11960)2/15/2006 5:18:57 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540831
 
They don't have a fixed pool of recruits and other resources, but they also don't have an unlimited pool. Economy of force still is an issue. Resources used in one area aren't available in another.

Tim