SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amy J who wrote (280952)3/20/2006 2:30:51 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572868
 
"There are some teachers that are seeking an easy way out (not the good ones, of course), so they put pressure on the parents to put their kids onto something"

And can they ever apply pressure. It is always the first thing out of their mouths. If you don't comply, they move your kid to the special education classes. And then that leads to all sort of social issues in school for the child. And if they were acting up before because of boredom, well...



To: Amy J who wrote (280952)3/21/2006 4:07:38 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572868
 
That's not good. There are some teachers that are seeking an easy way out (not the good ones, of course), so they put pressure on the parents to put their kids onto something (did you read about the case in NYC, where the court forced the parents to give their kids these types of drugs?) I would guess it's the talented kids that are put on that stuff because they simply have more energy and more intelligence than the average so a teacher/parent may think there's something wrong, when in fact they're simply not used to a smart, active child.

You know, Amy, its the teachers to some degree but I really think its the parents mostly. With both parents working, they can't deal with the kids losing it in any way. I remember a few years back when one of my friends was divorcing his wife......his boy started to lose it.....everyone was finding his behavior very unacceptable. My friend and his mother were talking about putting the kid on drugs. One day my friend, his mother and his brother were trying to decide which doctor to call when I finally lost it. I said what the kid needs is a therapist, not drugs. They all looked at me in shock.....as if I had a say in the matter. <g>

As it turned out, surprisingly, they listened to me and took the kid to a therapist. Within six months, he was much improved. Some times that's all it takes but parents aren't used to thinking of their kids needing some temporary therapy...."kids are resilient"; "they roll with the punches"; "they have nothing to be freaked out about" bla bla bla. Apparently, kids are not human, just the parents. ;-)

I wonder if anyone has yet made the common sense observation that the increase in drugs for kids exactly coincides with kids becoming less active outdoors.

Aahhh, Amy........you expect way to much. <g>

Again, I think the problem is today's lifestyle, not the kids. Get the kids outside to play with active exercise, and you would probably see the drug use decline. In Silicon Valley, you see zero children playing outside. They are all inside playing video games. I have never seen children as inactive as this. It's very, very unhealthy. When I was little, we would play outside all the time and run, run, run. No child was ever diagnosed with what the article describes because children not only played outside, but the system never imposed drugs onto children as a solution.

I know what you mean. They say 15% of the current crop of kids is obese. That's surprisingly high given the short time they've been on the planet.

ted