Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (163263)	4/10/2006 5:00:04 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 794009

Possibly a better question for sampling might be: Since Ahmadinejad has threatened the US and promised to :ipe Israel off the map,"should the US just wait around and let him do it, or should the US take any action to try to prevent that....If so, what action should be taken? Ahmadinejad has this to say.... militantislammonitor.org You suggested. Sample approach: "Gosh, I wonder if President Bush might be considering using tactical nuclear weapons against the Iranian nuclear program. What do you think?"

To: Ilaine who wrote (163263)	4/10/2006 5:30:21 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794009

The only evidence of any consideration of nuclear weapon use against Iran comes from Seymour Hersh. Not the best endorsement for such a thing, IMO. There are plans upon plans surrounding by plans in the Pentagon. I bet there is one somewhere for invading Mexico. Senile Sy Hersh is playing politics. And he's a bit of a self-admitted liar, but only when he's speaking! LOL. newyorkmetro.com Then there’s Sy. He’s the public speaker, the pundit. On the podium, Sy is willing to tell a story that’s not quite right, in order to convey a Larger Truth. “Sometimes I change events, dates, and places in a certain way to protect people,” Hersh told me. “I can’t fudge what I write. But I can certainly fudge what I say.”