Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (163280)	4/10/2006 5:50:28 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794011

I think that the whole premise of whether we are in fact considering a preemptive nuclear strike needs a whole lot more elaboration and analysis. I think the idea that we are actually and seriously thinking along those lines is ridiculous, one that has been pimped for political reasons by folks like Hersh and the rest of the folks who are afflicted by BDS.

To: Ilaine who wrote (163280)	4/10/2006 10:47:03 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794011

I'd be interested in knowing if the lady that cuts your hair, or the guy that changes the oil, even know who the heck Ahmadinejad is...

To: Ilaine who wrote (163280)	4/10/2006 10:55:02 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794011

I like my question better. But as you can see downstream, and upstream too....I'm certainly not in favor of nuking or even bombing Iran...H*ll, let Europe do it (pretty funny, that idea) or let Iran try to do something....The East Coast is closer to Iran.... Possibly a better question for sampling might be: Since Ahmadinejad has threatened the US and promised to "wipe Israel off the map,"should the US just wait around and let him do it, or should the US take any action to try to prevent that....If so, what action should be taken?