SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1403)6/4/2006 7:54:27 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
In 1768 Lazzaro Spallanzani proved that microbes came from the air, and could be killed by boiling. Yet it was not until 1862 that Louis Pasteur performed a series of careful experiments which conclusively proved that a truly sterile medium would remain sterile.

Three years earlier, Darwin's On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (published in 1859), had presented an argument that modern organisms had evolved, over immense periods of time, from simpler ancestral forms, that species changed over time. Darwin himself declined to speculate on some implications of his theory - that at some point there may have existed an ur-organism with no prior ancestor and that such an organism may have come into existence, formed from non-living molecules.

There were those who read Darwin's book who were more
willing to speculate on the impications of his theory


TP



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1403)6/4/2006 8:22:53 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
<But now impossible everywhere else on earth. >

I would think that if life sprang from "primordial soup", I would think it would still be springing from somewhere.

I also don't understand a creationists problem with primordial soup idea personally, as I would think they would assume it would point to god when found.

Anyone looking?

DAK