SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 12:29:35 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
I suppose I am in the middle.
It depends on how badly that kid was injured.
A better example for me would someone 78 years old that needs a heart transplant. Unless they have insurance I would only give them pain killers. I also believe in the right to die. If someone wants to go I say let them go. At birth, if someone was joined at the brain or whatever and there was a low probability of saving them, I would let them go without trying. But a 10 yr old that is all smashed up I sure would help, unless there was severe brain damage then I would suggest the thing to do would be to let him go. In short I am in favor of some sort of health care rationing depending on age and seriousness of injury and unless one has extra insurance, outside of those parameters I would say too bad.

That is the middle ground but trying to decide what and when and for who and how is not the easiest thing to define.

Mish



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 1:37:42 PM
From: gpowell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
The real issue is normative. As an example, if a ten year is seriously injured, and his parents have no insurance, what happens? In my view, the state should provide health care. In the Austrian view, the kid is out of luck (or to mask their view, they say a charity should step in - the result is the same).

You are confusing economics, Austrian or otherwise, with normative issues. In particular, you are ascribing to Austrian economics a strict libertarian view of the role of government in society. That is another error.

Its amazing how much of a person's views of economics flows from this simple example. And there is no way for the two sides to meet - they have different values.

I think the problem here is you are attempting to ground your particular value system in an economic theory. Why even try? Most economists don’t - why should you? Forget about economics, it is entirely reasonable to advocate for a particular institutional structure based upon values.

Enjoy Hayek's resurgence. Kiss him goodbye during the next downturn.

That isn’t likely. Hayek’s greatest contributions, in my opinion, were his work on tacit and dispersed knowledge and the closely related treatise on non-stationary general equilibrium (Theory of Pure Capital). It appears that you only know of Hayek from his adoption by some conservative ideologues. The same was true of Krugman.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 2:01:47 PM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
>>Enjoy Hayek's resurgence. Kiss him goodbye during the next downturn.

So the contribution for which he won the Nobel Prize, a study of aggregations of knowledge and how they influence decision-making, will be cast aside? Even the most ideological of economists on the left, such as Krugman or Roubini, rely on his results. What type of economic theory do you envisage that rejects Hayek's conclusions in this regard?

I don't see any Hayekian resurgence. Quite the opposite - both "liberals" and "conservatives" are illiberal these days.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 2:40:45 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
4 big retailers fight the inflation economy

Inflation is changing consumer behavior and the rules of engagement for many big retailers. Here's what it means for Wal-Mart, Costco, Target and Tiffany.

By Jim Jubak

Inflation is reshaping the economy. And since this is an odd kind of now-you-see-it, now-you-don't inflation, the changes in the economy are far-reaching but subtle.

You can see the shape of the new inflation economy in the tales of four retailers, all of which have released sales numbers recently.

If you're wealthy, you probably aren't feeling the current bout of inflation at all -- and you certainly aren't changing your buying habits.

Tiffany (TIF, news, msgs) is doing just fine, thank you.

If you belong to the lower half of the economic pyramid, higher inflation mostly takes the form of higher energy prices -- even though those aren't a part of the official inflation core. Stretching that paycheck to the end of the month is a challenge in the best of times and, since these aren't the best of times, you're hunting even harder for bargains. When you can't find them, you're cutting back on what you buy, period. Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) feels your pain at its cash registers.

And the middle-middle to upper-middle class? We're showing the most interesting and far-reaching changes in purchasing behavior of all. Although the overall rate of inflation is modest, inflation in the big-ticket service expenses, such as tuition and health care, that eat up a huge chunk of middle-class income is soaring at near double-digit rates.

But even though we may be strapped for cash, the middle class doesn't easily give up its aspirations to luxury. In our buying, we're looking to goods that combine low price with quality design to feed our appetite for luxury. And thanks to falling prices for goods, the middle class is finding it possible to buy luxury at bargain prices at stores such as Target (TGT, news, msgs) and Costco Wholesale (COST, news, msgs) that have cracked the code.
No inflation and double-digit inflation
It's all a result of the very peculiar nature of current inflation.

On the one hand, there is no inflation.

For example, I recently went shopping for a 5,000 BTU window air conditioner for my son's room to replace his very noisy and very energy inefficient seven-year-old unit. A year ago we paid $229 for a similar air conditioner for my daughter's room, so my wife and I were pleasantly surprised to find a new Panasonic 5,000 BTU, the updated version of the model we bought last year, selling for $179 at our local appliance store.

That's a huge 22% drop in the air-conditioner inflation index in a year.

On the other hand, there's double-digit inflation.

Private-school tuition for my two kids will pop 9% and 11%, respectively, for the 2006-07 academic year. That's above the national average of a 7.5% increase in college tuition for 2005, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But it's near the 9.5% increase in the national average in 2004 and the 8.4% increase in 2003.
Painful hikes in service costs
And tuition bills aren't the only thing going up at close to double-digit rates. In the first quarter of 2006, for example, health-care costs rose at an annualized rate of 8% to 10% (depending on whether you get your health care through an HMO or a individual physician), according to the Arlen Group, an employee-benefits consulting company.

What explains this now-you-see-it, now-you-don't inflation pattern?

The breakdown is pretty simple. If you're looking at the cost of a manufactured product, the price is likely to be steady or even falling. If you're looking at the cost of a service, the price is likely to be climbing and maybe even climbing fast.

According to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the three months that ended in April 2006, the annual inflation rate for personal-care products was -2%, for footwear -1.6%, and for new cars -0.3%. Meanwhile, the annual inflation rate for personal-care services was 4.1%, for tuition 5.4%, for hospital services 10.6%.
Stunned by gas prices
In short, any product facing the intense pressure of the global economy -- and the vast new manufacturing supply added to that global economy by China, India and other developing countries -- is likely to be showing very small price increases, despite the rise in the cost of raw materials such as oil, iron and copper. Any service that is domestically produced and that can't easily be outsourced to cheaper service providers overseas, such as hospital care, is rising in price -- often at a rate substantially above the official rate of inflation.

Energy is the huge exception to this pattern. The surge in gasoline prices in the first part of 2006 took the annualized inflation rate for the three months ending in April to 55%. That's a stunning number. It will come down as the gasoline-price spike of early 2006 yields to a more gradual increase in the price of gasoline. But as distorted as the number is by short-term volatility, it is a good indicator of the kind of pain that everybody who drives is feeling right now.

These inflation trends play out differently, however, depending on where you stand on the income pyramid. For lower-income consumers, the pain of higher energy prices trumps all else. The top income levels aren't yet seeing any reason to rein in their luxury buying. And the middle income levels, squeezed disproportionately by the huge inflation in services, are busy shifting costs.
Evidence at Wal-Mart
Higher energy prices have so much impact on lower-income consumers because these aren't exactly boom times for these folks to begin with. Real hourly wages for blue-collar manufacturing workers and non-managerial service workers were up, as of April 2006, 0.1% from April 2005. And, thanks to longer hours worked, weekly wages were up 0.4%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The cost of gasoline is up about 20% in that same period, according to the bureau.

That's some squeeze. And Wal-Mart felt it. On May 30, the company reported that same-store sales for May had climbed by just 2.3%, near the lower end of the 2% to 4% range that the company had projected. The company told investors and analysts: "As discussed in our first-quarter earnings call, we continue to see higher gasoline and utility prices impacting our customers. As a result, we have seen more pronounced paycheck cycles." In other words, thanks to higher gasoline prices, Wal-Mart's customers are running out of money before it's time for their next biweekly or monthly paycheck to arrive.

Even with falling prices for goods, these lower- to middle-income consumers can't make ends meet. They're already shopping at Wal-Mart because it offers the lowest prices they can find, so this group doesn't have a big opportunity to save a buck by changing its shopping habits. They simply shop less.
Who cares about price?
The high end of the market, the luxury end that Tiffany calls home, couldn't be more different. On May 31, Tiffany reported earnings of 30 cents a share for its quarter ended in April 2006. U.S. same-store sales actually fell by 1%, leading to disappointing 5.8% revenue growth for the quarter. But the company was able to increase its gross profit margin by almost 2 percentage points even as prices for its raw materials (gold, silver, and diamonds) pressed upward. Tiffany made up for those higher costs and then some by improving its product mix and raising prices. The rich, and those not-so-rich who look for a luxury fling at Tiffany, just aren't very price-sensitive.

And the middle and upper-middle classes? Their behavior is a volatile mix.

Unlike the rich and near-rich, these consumers feel the pain of energy inflation and the huge surge in inflation in education, health care and other services.

There isn't a whole lot that these consumers can do to avoid inflation in the services they consume -- services which represent a huge portion of the fixed costs of many middle-class and upper-middle-class families. But they can try to take advantage of falling prices for manufactured goods. Unlike the lower-income consumer who already shops the bargains at Wal-Mart, the lowest-cost store, most middle-class consumers can cut costs by bargain hunting. And that's what they seem to be doing, if the recent results from Target and Costco are an indication.

Middle-class consumers still chase luxury
On May 31, Costco reported huge numbers for the first quarter and for May. Same-store sales climbed 7% in the first quarter and increased by 10% in May. Those numbers were even better than the 5.1% same-store growth reported by Target for the first quarter and the 6% same-store growth analysts were projecting for May.

Why the big difference between results at Wal-Mart, on the one hand, and Costco and Target on the other? Because although middle- and upper-middle-class consumers want to save money, they're not yet willing to give up on their aspirations to luxury. At Target, these consumers feel they can find fashion, design, brand names and quality at prices that are lower than the specialty store or the anchor store at the mall -- even if the prices aren't the lowest. Costco, with its ever-changing mix of merchandise, almost always offers something for this quality-conscious consumer. (My upstairs neighbor, for example, makes regular Costco runs to buy lamb.)

For this cost-shifting middle- or upper-middle-class consumer, the price is right at Wal-Mart but the quality isn't. Wal-Mart knows this all too well. That's why the company has launched an effort to upgrade its store brands (taking a page from Target's book) and to renovate 1,800 stores to attract middle-income shoppers.
New tricks, new competition
I think this describes the battle for the middle- and upper-middle-class consumer that is still heating up. As inflation in services squeezes this consumer, the challenge to retailers will be to offer the right price point to attract this customer while also providing the kind of quality that this consumer demands. The signs of the battle are all around us.

Some companies will have to learn new tricks. Here in New York City, for example, Whole Foods Market (WFMI, news, msgs) faces new competition on quality and price from Trader Joe's. Whole Foods, which has built its growth on quality at any price, has suddenly started arguing in advertisements that its prices aren't as high as everyone thinks. (Good luck with that one.)

Other companies, such as Coach (COH, news, msgs) and Luxottica (LUX, news, msgs) will face the challenge of fine-tuning quality and price in a volatile economy.

And, of course, never count Wal-Mart out.
articles.moneycentral.msn.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 2:48:24 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
Living wage: How about $9 an hour?

With the federal minimum wage stuck at $5.15 for years, cities and states are rebelling. The so-called living-wage campaign rewards workers, but critics say it discourages business.

articles.moneycentral.msn.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 3:28:59 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Iran's nuclear ambition hits piggy banks

TEHRAN -- Threats of an international financial squeeze stemming from the showdown over Iran's nuclear program have sent Iranians scrambling to get their savings out of the country, or if that won't work, to convert them into gold.
An estimated $200 billion has left the country since last year's election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as president, accompanied by panic buying of gold. The Iranian stock exchange lost an estimated 20 percent of its value even as other bourses in the region rose.
"The most tangible effect of the threat of sanctions in the private sector is downsizing," said Farhad Sanadizadeh, a Tehran-based oil and gas consultant who has let 40 employees go in the past six months. "A lot of companies are not hiring new people and reducing their work force."
Last week, it was disclosed that most European banks are no longer facilitating money transfers from Iranian banks. Iran has already removed most of its capital from European banks, according to press reports, fearing a possible assets freeze.
Iran says it has a right to generate atomic energy and insists its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes, but the United States and most of its allies think it has a covert weapons program.
The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany, meeting in Vienna, Austria, on Thursday, offered Tehran incentives in return for ending its nuclear program. Washington has offered to join direct negotiations with Tehran if it halts enrichment of uranium that could be used in weapons production.
Iranian officials have not responded directly to the offer, but Iran's top leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reiterated in a nationally televised speech yesterday that Iran will not give up its right to produce nuclear fuel.
"If you make any mistake, definitely shipment of energy from this region will be seriously jeopardized. You have to know this," he added in what was seen as a warning to Washington against military action.
The United States is pushing for U.N. sanctions if Tehran fails to comply with the Security Council demands. Amid the escalating tension, prices of basic and imported goods are rising in Iran.
Iran's high inflation, estimated at 12 percent, coupled with the effect of sanctions fever has made cooking oil and wheat more expensive since the Persian New Year on March 21.
Hossein Mohammadi, a 24-year old refugee from Afghanistan, cleans houses in the Iranian capital for a living after leaving his war-ravaged homeland for the stability of its western neighbor.
These days, walking through the late afternoon crowds of families and young people flocking onto the tree-covered boulevards of north Tehran, he worries increasingly about sanctions being imposed on his adopted homeland.

"The lady I work for has already sold her Peugeot 206 [an expensive, French car assembled in Iran] because she says that if there was an economic embargo, gasoline and spare parts will become so expensive that it'll just sit in the garage and rust," he said.
Many Iranians also remain defiant in the face of looming sanctions. Some argued that shortages were a way of life during the 1980s, when the eight-year Iran-Iraq war led to Iran's international isolation and a rationing regime.
The announcement in April that Iran has mastered the nuclear cycle played to nationalist sentiments, making many Iranians feel their country has attained a level of technological sophistication that allows it to take its place alongside the West's advanced nation-states.
However, not all Iranians support the nuclear program. There is a significant silent minority who say that, although it is their country's right to generate nuclear energy under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it could come at a high cost.
"Stage by stage [the sanctions process] is starting, and it's all the fault of Ahmadinejad for insisting on us having a nuclear program," said Hamid Abedi, a 45-year-old furniture repairman who supplements his income by driving around in search of fares in the evenings.
"What's the point of us having nuclear energy if we're deprived of everything else?"

washingtontimes.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 5:06:22 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 116555
 
The market thought as much of Bernanke's speech as I did.
Mish

Remarks by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke
At the International Monetary Conference, Washington, D.C.
June 5, 2006

Panel Discussion: Comments on the Outlook for the U.S. Economy and Monetary Policy

I am pleased to be here this afternoon to participate in the International Monetary Conference. In my remarks, I will provide a brief update of the economic outlook for the United States and discuss the implications of that outlook for monetary policy.

It is reasonably clear that the U.S. economy is entering a period of transition. For the past three years or so, economic growth in the United States has been robust, reflecting both the ongoing re-employment of underutilized resources as well as the expansion of the economy's underlying productive potential, as determined by factors such as productivity trends and the growth of the labor force. Although we cannot ascertain the precise rates of resource utilization that the economy can sustain, we can have little doubt that, after three years of above-trend growth, slack has been substantially reduced. As a consequence, a sustainable, non-inflationary expansion is likely to involve some moderation in the growth of economic activity to a rate more consistent with the expansion of the nation's underlying productive capacity. It bears emphasizing that productivity growth seems likely to remain strong, supported by the diffusion of new technologies, capital investment, and the creative energies of businesses and workers. Thus, productive capacity should continue to expand over the next few years at a rate consistent with solid growth of real output.

Real gross domestic product grew rapidly in the first quarter of this year, but the anticipated moderation of economic growth seems now to be under way. Consumer spending, which makes up more than two-thirds of total spending, has decelerated noticeably in recent months. One source of this deceleration is higher energy prices, which have had an adverse impact on real household incomes and weighed on consumer attitudes. As had been expected, recent readings also indicate that the housing market is cooling, partly in response to increases in mortgage rates. To be sure, the data on home sales and construction have been somewhat erratic from month to month, reflecting weather conditions, statistical noise, and other factors. However, overall, housing activity has softened relative to the high levels of last summer, and the rate of house-price appreciation appears to have lessened. A slowing of the real estate market will likely have the effect of restraining other forms of household spending as well, as homeowners no longer experience increases in the equity value of their homes at the rapid pace seen in recent years.

Gains in payroll employment in recent months have been smaller than their average of the past couple of years, and initial claims for unemployment insurance have edged up. These developments are consistent with the softening in the pace of overall economic activity that seems to be under way. That said, going forward, relatively low unemployment and rising disposable incomes may counter to some extent the factors tending to restrain household spending.

Although spending by the household sector is showing signs of moderation, other sectors of the economy retain considerable momentum. According to the available data, business investment appears to have risen briskly, on net, so far this year. In particular, investment in nonresidential structures, which had been weak since 2001, seems to have picked up appreciably, raising the possibility that increased nonresidential construction may absorb some of the resources released by the slowing housing sector. Spending on equipment and software is also on a strong upward trend, and backlogs of orders for capital goods are still rising. Business investment is being supported by high rates of profitability and capacity utilization. Credit conditions for businesses are favorable: Although market participants appear to have become more attuned to risks in recent weeks, corporate bond spreads remain low, and banks are well capitalized and willing to lend.

Globally, output growth appears poised to exceed 4 percent for the fourth consecutive year--a strong performance that will support the U.S. economy by continuing to stimulate our exports of goods and services. The buoyant global economy does present some challenges, however. In particular, the increased world demand for crude oil and other primary commodities, together with the limited ability of suppliers to expand capacity in the short run, has led to substantial increases in the global prices of those goods. Those price increases are a partial offset to the forces supporting global growth and are also a source of inflationary pressure.

Longstanding concerns about global imbalances remain with us as well. Along with greater national saving in the United States, increased domestic demand in countries with current account surpluses and a greater flexibility of exchange rates more broadly would help to reduce those imbalances over time. Should U.S. economic growth moderate as expected, sustaining the global expansion will require a greater reliance by our trading partners on their own domestic spending as a source of growth.

Consumer price inflation has been elevated so far this year, due in large part to increases in energy prices. Core inflation readings--that is, measures excluding the prices of food and energy--have also been higher in recent months. While monthly inflation data are volatile, core inflation measured over the past three to six months has reached a level that, if sustained, would be at or above the upper end of the range that many economists, including myself, would consider consistent with price stability and the promotion of maximum long-run growth. For example, at annual rates, core inflation as measured by the consumer price index excluding food and energy prices was 3.2 percent over the past three months and 2.8 percent over the past six months. For core inflation based on the price index for personal consumption expenditures, the corresponding three-month and six-month figures are 3.0 percent and 2.3 percent. These are unwelcome developments.

Although the rate of pass-through from the higher prices of energy and other commodities to core consumer price inflation appears to have remained relatively low, the cumulative increases in energy and commodity prices have been large enough that they could account for some of the recent pickup in core inflation. Despite recent increases in spot oil prices, futures markets imply that oil prices are not expected to continue rising. The realization of that outcome would reduce one source of upward pressure on inflation. However, the volatility of these and other commodity prices is such that possible future increases in these prices remain a risk to the inflation outlook. Subdued growth in most broad measures of nominal labor compensation and the ongoing expansion of labor productivity have held down the rise in unit labor costs, the largest component of business costs. Anecdotal reports suggest, however, that the labor market is tight in some industries and occupations and that employers are having difficulty attracting certain types of skilled workers. Finally, some survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have edged up, on net, in recent months, as has the compensation for inflation and inflation risk implied by yields on nominal and inflation-indexed government debt. As yet, these expectations measures have remained within the ranges in which they have fluctuated in recent years, but these developments bear watching.

With the economy now evidently in a period of transition, monetary policy must be conducted with great care and with close attention to the evolution of the economic outlook as implied by incoming information. Given recent developments, the medium-term outlook for inflation will receive particular scrutiny. There is a strong consensus among the members of the Federal Open Market Committee that maintaining low and stable inflation is essential for achieving both parts of the dual mandate assigned to the Federal Reserve by the Congress. In particular, the evidence of recent decades, both from the United States and other countries, supports the conclusion that an environment of price stability promotes maximum sustainable growth in employment and output and a more stable real economy. Therefore, the Committee will be vigilant to ensure that the recent pattern of elevated monthly core inflation readings is not sustained.

Toward this end, and taking full account of the lags with which monetary policy affects the economy, the Committee will seek a trajectory for the economy that aligns economic activity with underlying productive capacity. Achieving this balance will foster sustainable growth and help to forestall one potential source of inflation pressure. In addition, the Committee must continue to resist any tendency for increases in energy and commodity prices to become permanently embedded in core inflation. The best way to prevent increases in energy and commodity prices from leading to persistently higher rates of inflation is by anchoring the public's long-term inflation expectations. Achieving this requires, first, a strong commitment of policymakers to maintaining price stability, which my colleagues and I share, and, second, a consistent pattern of policy responses to emerging developments as needed to accomplish that objective.

Our economy has reaped ample rewards in recent years from the achievement and maintenance of price stability. Although challenges confront us, as they always do, I am confident that we will be able to preserve those hard-won benefits while promoting sustainable economic growth.

federalreserve.gov



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 5:47:21 PM
From: anachronist  Respond to of 116555
 
The real issue is normative. As an example, if a ten year is seriously injured, and his parents have no insurance, what happens? In my view, the state should provide health care. In the Austrian view, the kid is out of luck

Did you read the LA times this Sunday? Front page article said that there is not enough health care providers to service all of our demands as a society (not that there ever could be). Scarce resources must be allocated in some manner. If they are not allocated economically (no money for healthcare? Too bad) they will be allocated using uneconomic means. Rationing will lead to the use of political influence and bribes to gain access to healthcare.

Since I have more capital than political influence, I'd prefer the economic model of resource allocation.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 6:31:29 PM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Children shouldn't be held responsible for their parents stupidity. Can't everyone agree on that?



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (52076)6/5/2006 11:16:02 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 116555
 




We are either beyond the animal kingdom or no eh?

gov bush just lost his animal friend:

news.tbo.com

Published: Jun 4, 2006
TALLAHASSEE - Gov. Jeb Bush's black Labrador retriever, Marvin, who was featured in a 1998 campaign ad and a popular resident of the governor's mansion, died Wednesday after suffering from cancer. He was 11.

So Bush gonna make even the animals count like people:

zeenews.com

Bill allows dogs to eat outside at restaurants

Orlando(Florida), June 06: At just 1 year old, Theo had already turned to a life of crime.

The tiny Yorkie would sneak into restaurants inside his owner's bag, usually undetected, but he and Marcy Richardson were occasionally kicked out. Now the 26-year-old Richardson and Theo can stop worrying and start chowing down.

Gov Jeb Bush on Friday signed the so-called "Doggie Dining" Bill, which allows local governments to let restaurants permit dogs to eat with their owners outside.

Florida health regulations previously prevented all dogs except service animals from joining patrons Al Fresco, although several restaurants ignored the rules until local regulators started cracking down last year.

Rep Sheri Mcinvale, an Orlando Republican, filed the Bill after some complained they were threatened with fines.

The measure creates a three-year pilot program, and the state will determine whether to continue it. Allowing dogs to dine will be up to each county, and even if it is allowed, restaurant owners will still decide individually whether to participate.

Bush said the Bill will allow dog lovers and their pets to "have a brewski together, have a hot dog together or whatever they want outdoors."

"It just seems like it's a small thing but it's going to be an important thing for a whole lot of people," he said.

Not everyone supported the bill. Orlando resident George Jones said he thought legally allowing dogs to dine in public was "the most ignorant thing I've ever seen."

Now shades was just in the drive thru of a burger king - and had to wait because the old lady in front of him decided to let her dog out to pee while we all sat in line - shades hamburger was getting cold waiting on benji to pee and was wondering why this was efficient. Now we need Ahahaha to tell us what a useless bleeding heart liberal you are Calculated.