SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191136)7/6/2006 5:36:19 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hawkmoon, your conspiracy theory bunkum and overt bigotry and christocrat fascism has gone over the edge.

Why did GM agressively abandon its electric cars? Why did it sell huge SUVs? Why was there enough oil pumped around the world to provide it at $10/bbl?

If you're going to look for conspiracy theories about control over oil, why don't you look at those who promote its wasteful usage decade after decade? Why don't you look at ExxonMobil, BP, the Bushes, the Carlyle Group, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Canada, Mexico, GM, Ford, legacy airlines, etc. etc.?

Exactly who do you think has more power to control oil, all of the above or Hamas? Your thinking is so off-kilter, you're in danger of going insane.

Really.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191136)7/6/2006 5:41:40 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
DEVELOPING STORY A senior U.S. official says Taepodong-2 missile spun out of control seconds after launch, and was never in operational control.

Is it possible Hawk that we used electronic jamming to disable that bad boy? They wouldnt know and we certainly wouldnt advertise the fact.