SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (298751)8/7/2006 11:07:49 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576702
 
He just modified it so it would look more artistic?

-Z



To: combjelly who wrote (298751)8/7/2006 11:20:07 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1576702
 
If he had eliminated most of the smoke would that have been ok?



To: combjelly who wrote (298751)8/8/2006 12:32:10 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576702
 
CJ, why would he modify the photo then if the original one already told enough of a story?

Kind of tells me that this guy has a habit of doctoring photos. Reuters did the right thing by dumping all of his work. I wonder if even Al Jazeera would give him the time of day ...

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (298751)8/8/2006 2:10:36 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576702
 
here is the photo in question

Oh my God! Harris is really on to something! Not really.

The original actually looks worse than the photoshopped one. Does anyone know what the photographer was trying to accomplish?



To: combjelly who wrote (298751)8/8/2006 1:55:32 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576702
 
Photographer has been fired.

End of story.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News