Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (212055)	9/30/2006 4:48:06 PM
From: plantlife	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Thanks for the insult, which I will consider a compliment coming from you. If you have any problems with the truth of my comments, please feel free to point them out. I'm sort of put off by back stabbers. Granted I'm new here, and my opinions are not meeting the approval of some, but I am here with a few posts left to defend myself. Prove what you say, don't just make accusations and hide in the bushes.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (212055)	10/1/2006 9:09:23 AM
From: plantlife	Respond to of 275872

However, I really don't think this is your reasoned point of view. You're like that plantlife. Just saying whatever you think might favor your investment. If by some chance you were short AMD, you would have produced equally bizarre arguments to rebut your current view. ________________________ In the above message to another poster I am used by you as an example of posting "whatever I thing might favor my investment." I think the implication you are making is that I would make up a story and post it, "true or false." I don't think I should be brought into the discussion as "a poster boy" for deliberately posting inaccurate information that benefit my investments. That IMO is a disgusting example of backstabbing. My response was to challenge you to prove the accusation. It remains unproven, and the accusation is still out there. Disagreement is fine and leads to better understanding of the issues, but character assasination by innuendo is a low blow, and I am calling you out on it.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (212055)	10/1/2006 9:12:37 AM
From: plantlife	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

However, I really don't think this is your reasoned point of view. You're like that plantlife. Just saying whatever you think might favor your investment. If by some chance you were short AMD, you would have produced equally bizarre arguments to rebut your current view. ________________________ In the above message to another poster I am used by you as an example of posting "whatever I thing might favor my investment." I think the implication you are making is that I would make up a story and post it, "true or false." I don't think I should be brought into the discussion as "a poster boy" for deliberately posting inaccurate information that benefit my investments. That IMO is a disgusting example of backstabbing. My response was to challenge you to prove the accusation. It remains unproven, and the accusation is still out there. Disagreement is fine and leads to better understanding of the issues, but character assassination by innuendo is a low blow, and I am calling you out on it.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (212055)	10/2/2006 1:26:02 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

re: do you think that a company that does all of its manufacturing outside the US will get sympathy from a US jury because the foreign chips are blocked from some other foreign market ? A third of those Sony and Toshiba chips were sold in computers in the US, at inflated prices compared to the competition. No, the jury will not have sympathy for AMD losing profits, but they will be mad as hell that Intel cost US consumers millions of dollars. In case you haven't heard, protecting consumers is the basis for US antitrust law. Petz