Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (14446)	1/4/2007 2:46:07 PM
From: insitusands	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

You're right. The article I quoted from did misquote NASA's report. However, upon reading your link I have no doubt as to what their opinion is on global warming. I'm confident that you and I are not expert enough to know how much damage global warming will inflict on the planet. Ergo, you do not know if Gore is "exaggerating" or not and if he is, then why do you believe that "...solutions to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels..." are not being sufficiently pursued? I believe that people are for more concerned about their political beliefs and agenda than they are about discussing what should be done about global warming. Why else would one drip scorn on someone who is trying to wake everybody up to what quite possibly is the most important global event of the future?

To: miraje who wrote (14446)	1/4/2007 3:44:33 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

And I can't, for the life of me, understand why solutions to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels, such as detailed in the link below, are not being pursued.. Probably because of the vocal, but politically potent, Bush backing minority who are insisting that there is no "warming" issue.