Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (147596)	1/12/2007 9:15:03 AM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Re: rookie mistake C2, I think you`re condemning Qualcomm`s legal team without first having command of the facts.It is inconceivable that Qualcomm was unaware of every word in the witnesses`s book, before retaining and later calling him. It also must have come up in his discovery deposition, as Broadcom would have questioned him on that point, to be prepared for his explanation.I`ll forgive your hysterical assertion, under the circumstances <gg>.

To: carranza2 who wrote (147596)	1/12/2007 9:21:00 AM
From: blimfark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

If Richardson is the pre-eminent expert in the field, could the Q have avoided bringing him in, knowing full well that BRCM would? It certainly is an unfortunate sequence of events, but I can't believe that the Q was unaware of this exposure. However, if this was a surprise it's time to get a new legal team. Send them your resume C2 :)