Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: upanddown who wrote (14929)	2/3/2007 6:09:37 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25575

It really is a waste of energy trying to rebut WH's "they won't tell us about the drilling cores" refrain. You would think we were drilling for ore or trying to locate a conventional reservoir. He refuses to understand that virtually every core is drilled into a known, oil bearing sand substrate. That there is nothing to be known by reporting core results in the traditional sense. They all "hit" oil. The results must be input into a data base of the resource and the parameters of contours, saturation and depth need to be analyzed in a comprehensive model before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn. This is where we are as Gusella continues to painstakingly explain. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

To: upanddown who wrote (14929)	2/3/2007 10:11:46 PM
From: Hunterbob	Respond to of 25575

"Wondering whether our resident geological expert (ie. Hickman) is satisfied with the very extensive core hole info provided in the latest CLL release"----and notice how he deliberately minimized that--as I and another poster have pointed out. Being skeptical is healthy but to mislead in such a fashion is scurrilous and more expected to be found on the stockhouse board.