SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : History's effect on Religion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (429)3/6/2007 7:11:18 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 520
 
So what's left? Here the Buddha lays out a subtle and quite unique epistemology: “Oh Kalamas, when you know for yourselves that certain things are unwholesome and wrong and bad, then give them up. And when you know that certain things are wholesome and good, then accept them and follow them.” But how to interpret this key passage?

Its kind of a Delphic Oracle type statement, one you can't argue with. Certainly it is how I live my life. Of course, in coming to know anything for oneself, we do an awful lot of standing on others shoulders in the modern world.

You might just call the above statement Freedom of Thought for example. Each person believes what he comes to believe on his own free will. But that does not sidestep the fact that our knowledge largely comes from the current collective pool of human knowledge. Not much comes from staring at ones navel.



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (429)3/6/2007 7:20:01 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 520
 
Sun: Since you are interested in such things, have you ever seen any attempt to look at religious ideas referenced to the religion's # of deities (lets call it N)? Are there any interesting patterns related to N that emerge?

We have the following:

N = 0 for Buddhism
N = 1 for Abrahamic religions
N >= 2 for many others.

It also leads to the thought that a good SciFi story might explore N < 0.