Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (61568)	3/27/2007 1:43:16 PM
From: sag	Respond to of 197348

Jim, you wrote <<Does this suggest that the Q’s royalty rate proposed to NOK in the license extension position is actually higher that the current contracted rate???????>>. I for one believe that the current royalty rate being offered to Nokia by Qualcomm is their standard rate but importantly this standard rate, from a negotiating point of view, applies to 3g devices and the GSM/GPRS/EDGE patents currently being infringed upon by Nokia for their use in Nokia non 3G handsets. In effect the same rate applied to 2, 2.5 and 3g Nokia handsets!

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (61568)	3/27/2007 2:11:51 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197348

"Does this suggest that the Q’s royalty rate proposed to NOK in the license extension position is actually higher that the current contracted rate???????" No, "exact same terms" per Steve Altman. Message 23220626