SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225554)3/29/2007 11:56:07 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Arabs havent won a damn thing by this strategy. Thats why the Saudi initiative may signal a break from the past. Of course now there are the iranians who can finance what the next intifada if there was an agreeement. For the saudi initiatve to work, at a minimum hamas must by in at least de facto. One can wait for de jure, but not for de facto.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225554)3/29/2007 8:36:06 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Like in 1948, 1967, 1973, 1979, 1988, 1993, 2000, you mean?

Over the time period above, Israel advanced in size significantly. You must keep firmly in mind that the issue is land vs. security. I see the two quite symmetrically. You don't. It was fundamentally the same issue in Rhodesia, just dressed in different clothing.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News