Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (57252)	4/4/2007 10:08:10 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I agree with what you say in the post to which I am replying, but I feel compelled to note that the line you quote from me was serious, not sarcastic. The comments to which I was responding were inappropriate. The rest of my post, BTW, was only mildly sarcastic.

To: Sully- who wrote (57252)	4/4/2007 10:29:24 AM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Actually Sully, while I attempted to inject some humor in the subject, That was a very serious question. I was watching Nan on CNN, and she was on her way to Syria. The US has no diplomatic relationship with Syria. Nan Pelosi is only two deaths away from being president, and If there were a horrible and tragic accident, could become president, while in the custody of and under the protection of the President of Syria. She has entered a country where various terrorist organizations have complete access to the president of the country, and she is 3rd in line for the presidency of the United States. So, how far should the US go to get her back if she is taken Hostage? Should the third person in line for the Presidency be in Syria in the first place?