Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (204586)	4/29/2007 10:13:59 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

Only if you ignored or did not understand my excellent arguments. And don't get snippy. When you engage someone on the thread you engage everyone who cares to weigh in. [For the record, IMO, the preponderance of evidence weighs against those being serious statements.]

To: Lane3 who wrote (204586)	4/29/2007 10:36:28 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

What you may or may not have said was external to my discussion. I did not engage you. well, when you engage the thread you engage everyone reading if you make an argument, expect to be addressed by those who find it worthy on non-worthy on the merits..... i've had the distinct displeasure of reading your nonsensical 'possible' argument wrt the crow statements that, quite IMO, fly in the face of the logical conclusion one would take upon reading the crow blog only AFTER she was the object of public ridicule (gee reality BITES) did the 'it was a joke' excuse come into being... a gullible, no strike that, disingenuous person like yourself might buy into that, if of course it fits your predetermined POV wrt her advocacy agenda... i take her remarks as what they were at face value, i saw nothing in her original remarks to indicate she was joking your willingness to accept the 'joking' defense comports with your reflexive and instinctive bias that's your problem, not mine i'm looking at what she actually said and drawing my conclusion not what is merely "possible" (wow, gee isn't nearly ANYTHING possible? frankly i guess so, for argument sake.....i suppose anything is possible ergo, she was joking right?) WRONG look at her words, look at the context, look at her intensity of SUPPORT for the global warming meme the answer is obvious except to those like yourself who are unwilling to accept that a proponent of your bias could be so incredibly stupid.... iow.... birds of a feather???? mercy me!