SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (5606)6/12/2007 5:49:54 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Doesn't the question (economically speaking...) become "who's ox is getting gored?"

Because, if the feds are forcing unfunded service mandates upon the States (as States have charged, in relation to immigration issues, no child left behind, etc., etc.) that's ONE THING....

While, the federal budget itself might be benefiting from the presence of illegals in our economy (working under phony SS numbers, from which phony accounts they can not collect SS benefits in the future)... as the Congressional Budget Office and the Social Security Administration have calculated, tens of billions going into the SS program (and, indirectly supporting the SS payouts for legal citizens....)

WHOSE ox, and WHAT costs are being considered....



To: TimF who wrote (5606)6/12/2007 6:00:49 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
This clearly expresses a fundamental tenet of conservative/libertarian thinking: that engaging in risky behavior with serious social costs is an entitlement. People who are injured by metal bats, or fall ill from smoking or fatty food, cost the rest of us money. We pay their emergency room bill, their Medicare bills or their Social Security disablity insurance. Only someone willing to forgo those benefits should have the right to also opt out of public health laws...

I wonder if that same "tenet" applies to everyone who engages in voluntary risky behavior? Like driving to work in the morning?



To: TimF who wrote (5606)6/12/2007 9:26:57 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Here's the answer:http://www.joinrudy2008.com/